American Dissident Voices Broadcast of July 5, 2008
A Good Time for Freedom
By Erich Gliebe

Welcome to this week's broadcast of American Dissident Voices,
the Internet radio program of the National Alliance. I'm your
host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

It's hard to imagine what the Founding Fathers would say to us
today if they could see what's become of the country they brought
into being. Certainly they would be amazed at all of the
technological gadgetry, not to mention the vast infrastructure
and the transportation systems that tie everything together.
Chances are, those would be the first things that catch their
attention, and those things might capture their interest for
quite a while -- a week or more, maybe. But pretty soon, the
novelty and the wonder about all of the electronics and
communications media would have worn off, except for perhaps
Benjamin Franklin, who was not only a smooth-talking statesman
who almost single-handedly was able to bring France into the
Revolutionary War on the side of the Colonies, but was also a
first-rate scientist who was a world leader in the study of
electricity.

And after the newness of everything had worn off, the Founding
Fathers undoubtedly would have looked deeper into what America
had become. After all, this was the nation that they had risked
everything to found; one doesn't snub what was the most powerful
nation on Earth at the time without the possibility that one will
be defeated and lose not only freedom and property, but also
historical reputation, which -- for some White men -- might be
the worst punishment of all.

And when the Founding Fathers looked more deeply into the America
of the 21st Century, there is a good chance that they wouldn't
like what they saw. They would probably be aghast at the level of
taxation that has been imposed on the people to prop up an
inefficient government that sticks its nose into the internal
affairs of other nations and shows itself more and more every
decade to be yet further from what Abraham Lincoln called, in the
famous Gettysburg Address, a government "of the people, by the
people, and for the people."

They would be appalled at the nation's willingness to subsidize
with food, clothing, and housing an army of people who, at best,
make only a half-hearted effort to provide for themselves and
who, at worst, make a whole-hearted effort to procreate early and
often, and for as many years as Nature will allow.

They would be quick to comprehend the true power wielded by the
mass media of news and entertainment, and they would immediately
understand that those who held the reins of that power -- and not
the American people -- were the rulers of the country.

The Founding Fathers would probably frown at how George W. Bush
has surrounded himself with aliens who have an agenda that is
equal parts pro-alien and anti-White, and they most certainly
would have been sickened by the way in which Bush has prostituted
himself to curry the favor of those aliens and dishonored himself
and his country in doing their bidding.

Now, whether or not the Founding Fathers would have touched
explicitly on the concept of race in delineating their objections
to the America that we experience today, there can be no doubt
that, to a man, the Founding Fathers were quite conscious of race
and quite intent that the integrity of the White race must remain
intact. One year after George Washington became America's first
Chief Executive, the Naturalization Act of 1790 was passed, which
limited citizenship to "free white persons." For Blacks,
mestizos, or East or South Asians to play a role in this country
would have been unthinkable.

So it is likely that a Founding Father who could comment about
what America has become in the last 200 years would use
explicitly racial terms in describing what he sees. But whether
race came up or not, it is almost certain that the Founding
Fathers would notice that, despite an omnipotent media that
attempts to make every American think, feel, and behave the same
way, there is a palpable feeling of disconnectedness that clings
to every aspect of American life in the 21st Century. All of the
media's efforts notwithstanding, America is being torn apart:
there is more disagreement, more conflict, more "minding one's
own business" than there has ever been. And all of this
alienation is a direct result of a situation that the Founding
Fathers tried to avoid, through legislation like the
Naturalization Act of 1790. That situation was a racially
polyglot country, in which the people had no common history and
no common destiny.

Since hindsight is 20/20, we can look back now and say that,
unfortunately, the Founding Fathers were more worried about
freedom than about race. Their viewpoint is understandable; in
their day, pretty much everyone was White, and it was assumed
that things would stay that way. Blacks were a tiny and enslaved
minority, and it was assumed that things would stay that way. The
media didn't have nearly the power that it has today, and no Jews
controlled the media that did exist, and it was assumed that
things would stay that way.

And so the Founding Fathers spent most of their time tackling the
problems that were the most pressing to them: a system of
government based on a checks-and-balances system, freedom of
speech and of the press, freedom of religion, the right to keep
and bear arms, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures,
and so on. Their attempt to lay out a non-tyrannical system of
government resulted in the United States Constitution, and the
Bill of Rights served to limit, as best the Fathers could
foresee, the potentially-intrusive power of that government.

So, despite the understanding that the new nation was -- to the
core -- a White nation that was meant to remain White, the
Founding Fathers didn't explicitly make the United States a White
racial state. They didn't put the White race at the top of their
list of priorities because everyone was on the same page on the
matter. It was understood that temporary agreements might be made
with the Indians, but virtually all White Americans at the time
of the nation's founding viewed the relationship between Whites
and Indians as a "Them vs. Us" relationship. There might be
temporary alliances…but only temporary ones. Blacks were valuable
as workers on the plantations, but they were definitely second-
or third-class citizens. Of course, today we know that NO number
of non-Whites must be permitted within the White racial state
that we in the National Alliance envision, but we'll deal with
that later.

A hundred and fifty years later, when Adolf Hitler came to power
in Germany, he and many other National Socialists from every
nation in Europe clearly understood the need to be explicit about
race. From years of contact with Jews in Germany and from seeing
the debilitating effect of integration and mongrelization on the
vitality of neighboring France, Hitler made race the foremost
issue throughout Germany, and hundreds of thousands of non-German
Europeans welcomed his putting race at the front and center of
European politics. From the open-arms welcome that German troops
received throughout much of conquered Europe -- especially in
Eastern Europe, where the people knew firsthand of the communist
poison -- to the volunteer military units of every European
nationality that were formed to destroy that poison, it was clear
to Europeans at the time that National Socialism, far from being
merely a Pan-German Folk movement, was a new philosophy that was
meant to embrace the entire White race.

But the Founding Fathers lacked the long-term, close contact with
the non-White races that the National Socialists knew about in
the 1920s and 1930s, and that we know about today. And because
they focused on freedom rather than racial integrity, the
Founding Fathers inadvertently have put us in the position today
in which we have nearly lost BOTH our freedom and our racial
integrity.

The love of freedom is a trait that all humans possess to some
degree but, according to the late founder of the National
Alliance, Dr. William L. Pierce, our race has a particularly
strong regard for individual freedom. We don't like to be told
what to do, and we'll continue doing what we don't what to do for
only so long. Furthermore, we don't like to be told what to
think: what's right and what's wrong, which ideas about God are
correct, and so on.

The love of these freedoms is what drove our European ancestors
by the millions to make the journey to America to start a new
life. Some wanted the freedom to worship as they wished to. Some
came in search of land and opportunity. But in every case, it all
boiled down to freedom: freedom to think and act how they wanted
to, freedom to be their own masters on land that provided for
their needs and brought in an adequate income as well, and
freedom to live in peace without the interference of tyrannical
rulers whose concerns were more focused on keeping the royal
coffers filled than on the well-being of the people.

And the nation that the Founding Fathers constructed was a direct
reflection of these shared values regarding freedom. Individual
freedom was maximized and the power of the government that was
agreed-upon to be necessary was kept to a minimum. With the
Constitution and the Bill of Rights, it seemed that a utopia on
Earth had finally been achieved, and that utopian vision is still
the one that is pumped into the heads of American schoolchildren,
despite the fact that it is pure fantasy.

There were two problems with the new democratic system as it was
set up by the Founding Fathers. The first, which I've already
mentioned, was that there was very little explicit reference to
race, and there was very little put into place that was meant to
ensure the racial integrity of the nation. This flaw will prove
fatal in the end, as we are clearly seeing in everything that
goes on around us today. Even before the nation was one hundred
years old, this flaw had created a rift in the country that led
to the Civil War which, unfortunately, only weakened the White
racial stock of the country and did nothing in the way of fixing
this flaw. In fact, eventually, the Civil War only led to even
more breaches of the wall of racial integrity. Explicit White
racialism from Day One -- rather than implicit racialism -- might
have channeled the energies of the nation into more productive
channels over the past two centuries.

Anyway, the other problem with the new democratic system was the
assumption that every man -- or, in the words of the
Naturalization Act of 1790, every "free white person" -- will
take an active interest in the governance of the nation. In other
words, the idea of a government "by the people" is a myth. Most
people are far more concerned with their own lives than with the
activities of government and, furthermore, most either don't want
to take the time or don't have the mental wherewithal to
understand all of the policies and actions of government. The
only time that most people start paying close attention to what
the government is doing is when its actions directly affect their
lives and livelihoods. In a letter to John Hancock, George
Washington complained about the self-centeredness among the men
of the Continental Army:
"When men are irritated, & the Passions inflamed, they fly
hastily, and cheerfully to Arms, but after the first emotions are
over to expect that they are influenced by any other principles
than those of Interest, is to look for what never did, & I fear
never will happen."

So, contrary to the assumptions of a supposedly freedom-loving
democracy, self-interest rules the roost, and participating
actively in running the country is way down on the list of
priorities for most people. And that is a good thing, because if
everyone wanted to actively participate in governing the country,
it would be total chaos. Nothing would ever get done, and a
smoothly-running society would be out of the question.

Unfortunately, because there were essentially no explicit
principles of White racialism in the founding of America, a
certain group with an egomaniacal self-interest took advantage of
the freedoms that WERE explicit and soon came to dominate the
nation. That group, of course, was the Jews. In this country,
they started out mainly in the world of trade and commerce, and
later moved into finance and the fledgling mass media. Today, our
country is riddled with them, from the media moguls and the
financial giants to the advisors of government and the "leading
thinkers and doers" in every field of endeavor.

And obviously, the weight of the media contributes to Jewish
advancement everywhere. That is WHY there are so many Jewish
stars in music and Hollywood; that is WHY Jews seem to be at the
top of every field of endeavor; that is WHY Israel is venerated
by every mass media outlet; that is WHY most Americans probably
think that criticizing the Jews is a criminal offense, even
though it isn't -- YET.

And the Jewish establishment now uses the American government,
which was established to preserve freedom, to take away the right
of Iraqis and Afghans to rule themselves. The Jewish
establishment now uses the American government to take away the
rights of American citizens so that illegal immigrants can
further pollute what's left of the White racial gene pool in this
country.

On July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was signed on
the understanding that it was immoral for one political entity to
coerce another to do its bidding. The Constitution and the Bill
of Rights were signed on the understanding that it was immoral
for the state to coerce its citizens to think and act in a
certain way. The freedoms that Americans have taken for granted
for more than two centuries are meant to protect U.S. citizens
from coercion -- from having to do what someone else wants one to
do.

Unfortunately, the Jews have taken those freedoms, used them to
gain their present posts of power, and are now flexing that power
to coerce the rest of us to think and act like THEY want us to.
They WANT us to welcome more and more non-Whites into our
country. They WANT our young people to turn away from their own
racial heritage, to become Africanized through Black music, and
to court and wed non-Whites. And the freedoms that we have to
speak out against all of this? They want to destroy them.

White racialists want freedom for our race. We see what a
multiracial society does to all of its members, and we are tired
of being coerced by a Jewish establishment that cares not a whit
for our freedoms, either the freedom of our whole race or our
freedom to speak out against what we see as wrong, not to mention
our freedom to defend ourselves by force of arms.

On this Independence Day weekend, I'd like you to imagine the
spirit of excitement and unity that would pulse through the
all-White nation that we in the National Alliance are striving to
bring into being. And then I'd like you to choose to do something
about it, by joining forces with me and the other members of the
National Alliance. With an all-White nation with an explicitly
racialist foundation, our racial freedoms and our individual
freedoms will pave the way for a new and glorious future for our
people.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
SUBSCRIBE to NATIONAL VANGUARD, our unique, thought-provoking 
magazine -- $22 US, $30 Canada, and $40 Foreign.
This is for six high-quality, glossy color issues:

SEND $3 for our 88-page CATALOG of books and other items:

     National Vanguard Books
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Donations are needed to keep this program on the air. Give $20
today!
http://www.natvanbooks.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_prod.html?p_prodid=599
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. 
This 
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to
be 
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup
posting.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The National Alliance: www.natvan.com & www.natall.com
National Vanguard Books: www.natvanbooks.com

(c) 2008 National Vanguard Books