American Dissident Voices Broadcast of June 16, 2007
The Reality of it All
By Erich Gliebe

Hello again, and welcome back to this week's edition of American
Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. I'm
your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Well, wouldn't you know it? Just when I'm ready to move past the
"Holocaust" and onto another subject of import, a
widely-publicized "Holocaust" news item pops up in the national
media. I'd be remiss if I didn't comment on it to an audience
that might be interested.

Perhaps you've heard of the recent fate of Norman Finkelstein, a
Jewish professor of political science at DePaul University in
Chicago. Finkelstein, the son of "Holocaust" survivors, has
gotten plenty of media coverage over the last five years or so,
due to his criticism of how the Jewish Establishment is using the
so-called "Holocaust" as a weapon to manipulate the Gentile
masses and to prop up the State of Israel. Particularly
interesting is Finkelstein's long-standing and heated battle with
Harvard University's Alan Dershowitz, another Jew who -- like
most Jews -- is not at all pleased at Finkelstein's attempt at a
balanced perspective on the Holocaust. Finkelstein's most widely
read book, entitled The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the
Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, has been around since the year
2000 and has fueled much of the feather-ruffling among Jews who
are eager to continue riding high on the non-Jewish population.
Finkelstein's most recent work, Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of
Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, hasn't done anything to
mend the fences.

Well, this past week, the Jew Finkelstein was denied tenure at
DePaul -- which is, rather ironically, a university affiliated
with the Roman Catholic Church. The reasons cited center on
Finkelstein's apparent habit of ad hominem attacks -- that is,
attacks directed against another's character rather than against
potential weaknesses in his ideological position -- on those who
oppose him. These are the sort of attacks that we White
racialists experience every day from the predominantly Jewish
media, which attempt to characterize us as uncultured bigots, but
rarely if ever attempt to discredit our most fundamental
position, which is that the world would be a better place if it
were partitioned on the basis of race, rather than by arbitrary
geographic borders that -- in the West -- entrap millions of
people of every race and color in a society that hypocritically
gets indignant when these mongrelized millions don't get along.
Anyway, whatever Finkelstein's scholarship -- I haven't read any
of his books -- his alleged habit of ad hominem attacks seems to
me to be just an outgrowth of his Jewishness, a trait he shares
with most other Jews and which is, as such, no big deal to people
who are familiar with the way Jews usually operate.

Despite Finkelstein's unusual and controversial position as a Jew
who pushes for moderation on the part of the Holocaust industry,
not everyone thought that he should be denied tenure at DePaul.
According to news reports, Finkelstein has been known as an
excellent teacher since he first started at DePaul in 2001, and
he is well-liked by his students. His colleagues in the political
science department voted nine to three in favor of tenure for
Finkelstein, and a personnel committee also voted in favor,
unanimously: five to zero, although the committee DID list some
reservations about Finkelstein's personality and his habit of
lashing out at his critics. It was a panel of seven faculty
members which then voted four to three AGAINST tenure for
Finkelstein, a decision that was upheld by DePaul University
president, the Reverend Dennis Holtschneider. Holtschneider's
letter, which was delivered to Finkelstein's residence in
Brooklyn, New York, has been placed on Finkelstein's website for
you to peruse at your leisure. In his letter, the Reverend
Holtschneider cites the ad hominem attacks and "iffy" scholarship
as the reasons for denying Finkelstein tenure, although I'm
guessing that none of this would be an issue if the Jewish
professor wasn't an outspoken critic of the way the Jewish
Establishment has milked the so-called "Holocaust" to accrue
advantages for itself, benefits, and immunity from criticism.

Anyway, what conclusions can we draw from all of this? Firstly,
although I have not looked very deeply into the situation, none
of the news reports that I saw suggested that the Jew Norman
Finkelstein was a historical revisionist, one of those so-called
"deniers" of the Holocaust who claim that the official tale of
the Holocaust as told by the news media, the schools, and the
government is grossly inaccurate. From what I gather, either
Finkelstein believes the official version of the story OR he
doubts it but has decided that rather than fight it from the
standpoint of a revisionist, he chose the much safer route of
stating the simple and totally obvious fact that the Jewish
Establishment is milking it for all its worth. If the latter is
Finkelstein's position, then presumably he is envisioning the
so-called Holocaust story blowing up in the face of the Jews, and
thereby doing, in the long run, more harm than good. In all
honesty, for all of Norman Finkelstein's efforts, it may be too
late for that; even if the official version of the story were
shown to be a complete lie TODAY, the resultant indignation and
venom directed at the Jews might wash away any of Finkelstein's
well-meaning attempts to tame it. But that isn't a scenario that
is even close to reality right now, so any discussion of a
potential backlash against the Jews is purely academic.

Secondly, it seems to me that DePaul University's denial of
tenure for Norman Finkelstein suggests not only that, in the mind
of the Jewish Establishment, NO ONE -- not even a Jew -- is
allowed to question any aspect of the official version of the
Holocaust story, but also, neither is anyone allowed to question
the misuse of that story by the Jews for their own benefit. This
is an important distinction, because now we know that not only
must we not chisel away at the bedrock of the official story
itself, but we must not throw rocks at the edifice that has been
built atop that foundation.

Lastly, let me just say a few words about Jews who are fighting
against the Holocaust or its abuse in the holding down of
non-Jewish races. I'll be perfectly frank with you when I say
that it's difficult for me to come to grips with a Jew like
Finkelstein. It's difficult to know whether Finkelstein is acting
on his own -- a man who sincerely believes in his position and is
putting his whole self into the fight he's chosen to wage -- or
whether he's just a cog in the wheel of Jewish power, put there
to be the token "good Jew," the Jew every gullible, naive Gentile
can point to and say, "See? Not all Jews are out to gather the
world's wealth and, if need be, exterminate any race they view as
a challenge to them. Here's one right here: this guy Finkelstein,
who was fighting against the Jews, trying to get them to back off
on their outrageous demands for compensation for being the target
of the Holocaust."

Of course, there is no doubt that there are many such token "good
Jews" who are where they are for the sole purpose of causing
confusion among the Gentile masses. Several examples include
"Jews for Free Speech" groups, "Jews for the Second Amendment"
groups, and so on. The main purpose of such groups is to deflect
criticism away from Jews IN GENERAL, so that if someone makes a
blanket statement such as, "All Jews oppose the private ownership
of firearms," the media can immediately offer up a token "good
Jew" group as evidence that such a blanket statement is
fallacious. An additional by-product is to discredit the maker of
the statement, which encourages the public to ignore the claims
of that individual, however valid they may in large part be.

So it's my contention that many of the "good Jew" groups out
there are, in fact, token "good Jew" groups, placed there by a
larger hand that tries to manage the affairs of the White West.
And, aside from the token "good Jew" groups, there have been --
and continue to be -- Jewish takeovers of anti-Jewish groups...
groups such as racialist and other patriotic organizations.
Certain Jews, by virtue of their resemblance to White people,
join (or should I say infiltrate?) organizations and eventually
rise to a position where they can exert a controlling influence
on the organization, either turning it away from its original
purpose or by successfully destroying it through managed
infighting. It's just another weapon that our enemies use against
us, and we just have to realize that that's the way things are
and be on guard against it as best we can.

But we should all realize that not every Jew is an active part of
the Jewish Establishment which, to me, is the semi-organized
power structure that is in the lead in destroying Western culture
and the White race that created it. Some Jews are just going
about their daily activities, minding their own business, and
more-or-less fitting in with the larger society, as much as Jews
can fit in. Although my knowledge of Finkelstein's activities is
limited, I nonetheless believe that Norman Finkelstein is one of
these ordinary Jews, not placed where he is by a higher power,
but just calling the shots as he sees them.

For that bravery, he deserves some credit, as do Jews like those
who have attempted in various ways to explain their more
vindictive brethren's behavior to the rest of the world. Many of
the books on Jews and the Jewish Problem that are sold by
National Vanguard Books were written by Jews who were, like
Finkelstein, concerned that the Jews' brazenness and "chutzpah"
would eventually backfire on them. Much of what we know about the
inner workings of the Jewish mind and the Jewish community has
been provided to us by Jews themselves. We should be grateful to
this Jewish minority because the picture they have given us of
the Jewish Establishment from the inside has reinforced the
conclusions we've drawn about that Establishment by observing it
from the outside. This agreement gives us White racialists
confidence that we are on the right track on our ideology and our
approach toward the building of a better world.

Anyway, despite our thanks to the small number of Jews who have
given us an inside look at the Jewish mentality, the fact remains
that, as White racialists, we believe that the best way for the
world to operate is for people to be divided on the basis of
race, without exception. In other words, while some Jews may have
done us a good turn by providing information that would otherwise
be hard to come by, these Jews are exceptions rather than the
norm. It is the CUMULATIVE EFFECT of the Jewish community on our
people that concerns us, and that cumulative effect is a highly
negative one, as has been shown in more than a thousand years of
history, dating back at least to Roman times and perhaps earlier.

As just one example, the Jews today have secured an
overwhelmingly dominant position in our news and entertainment
media and, through it, have polluted the mind and soul of our
people for almost a century. Through this media, through their
strong lobbying influence, and through their holding of important
posts of power in our government, they are using the power of
media and the power of government in tandem to push their own
agenda, which -- among other things -- is an agenda of
destruction for our people. So, no matter what an individual Jew
has done or failed to do, he will be excluded from the White
homeland that we in the National Alliance hope to secure in the
soon-to-be future. He will be excluded NOT out of malice, but out
of a simple understanding of racial realities, the most basic
being that a racially heterogeneous population lacks the unity of
soul and the unity of purpose that White racialists view as the
highest good.

Such is the way the races are. Blame whatever Creator you believe
in, if you are into blaming others; if not, just accept what the
Creator made in the Universe and try to make it better. No matter
what lies are offered up for public consumption about us, that's
what we're trying to do, in the National Alliance: maintain what
Nature created and, if we can, make it better than it's ever been
before.

Just as I mentioned above about the Jews, there will always be
individuals of various races that we will find admirable, or who
will exchange one good turn for another with us for the mutual
benefit of both. Black separatists come to mind here, or the
Arabic peoples who demand independence from Western influences.
It is not too hard to imagine us White racialists negotiating in
concert with such groups, since we share similar goals:
independence from alien domination and the freedom to pursue our
own ends as distinct racial entities.

But it is ludicrous to expect that, just because we agree on some
of the most basic ideas, that we should welcome into our White
homeland non-Whites of any kind, no matter their knowledge or
skills or the values they allegedly hold. This point is obvious
to any of my audience who fall into any "separatist" category; it
is only a mystery to those of clouded mind who fancy the notion
that race is a mere superficial factor in the history of nations
and peoples. Strangely, it seems, these are some of the people we
are trying to educate by various means -- one of which is this
program -- and turn to our viewpoint.

And the point I'd like to stress for that "on the fence" group of
intelligent and capable Whites who yet remain skeptical about
whether the White Racialist Cause deserves their support and
activism, is this: It is the effect of the Jewish race as a whole
on our people that is significant and, from our perspective, that
effect is a negative one. And because of that, the Jewish and the
White races must be separated, without exception.

It is not the effect, good or bad, of individual Jews that we
racialists are talking about when we criticize "the Jews." As we
have seen in the case of Norman Finkelstein and the Jewish
authors of books exposing Jewish schemes and treachery toward
Gentiles, some Jews are -- in their own way -- contributing to
the body of information that strengthens Our Cause. Many times on
these programs, as well as elsewhere in literature disseminated
by the National Alliance and others, we have pointed out
individual Jews whose specific behaviors clearly illustrate the
negative effect of THOSE individual Jews.

I'll continue to criticize individual Jews, as the need arises. I
don't like what many of them are doing to our people, and I'll
want to tell you about it. But it is the SUMMATION of every act
by every Jew that we are most concerned about and, Norman
Finkelstein notwithstanding, that summation is grossly in the
negative.

The last point I'd like to make today follows up on the idea that
it is the effect of the Jews as a group that we White racialists
are most concerned about. Because it is the group effect that
concerns us, there will be group consequences when the time
comes. Hopefully, those consequences will be nothing more than a
removal of all Jews from the new White homeland. At least, those
will be the consequences if we White racialists have our way.

But if, on the other hand, the powers that be refuse to listen to
reason and cling desperately to their Nature-hating values and
their destructive power until the very last instant, then the
consequences for everyone is likely to be much, much uglier. Why
not adopt -- rather than rely on the stopgap efforts of "good
Jews" like Norman Finkelstein to keep the peace.

The National Alliance has a plan for peace. We just need the
means to implement it. You should join us.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of
ADV-list.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

==> To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to this mailing list go here:
http://www.natvan.com/mailing-list/

==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. 
This 
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to
be 
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup
posting.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

SUBSCRIBE to NATIONAL VANGUARD, our unique, thought-provoking 
magazine -- $22 US, $30 Canada, and $40 Foreign.
This is for six high-quality, glossy color issues:

SEND $3 for our 88-page CATALOG of books and other items:

     National Vanguard Books
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Donations are needed to keep this program on the air. Give $20
today!
http://www.natvanbooks.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_prod.html?p_prodid=599

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

To report typos and technical errors in ADV-list or our web site,
please write to:
 webmaster@natvan.com   (Subject: TYPO)

The National Alliance: www.natvan.com & www.natall.com
National Vanguard Books: www.natvanbooks.com

(c) 2007 National Vanguard Books