American Dissident Voices Broadcast of November 18, 2006
Politics and Accountability

Welcome back to this week's edition of American Dissident Voices.
I'm your host, Erich Gliebe.

Now that the smoke has cleared after the midterm election, it's
time to try to make some sense of what happened last week at the
polls, why it happened, and what we will likely see down the road
in the political arena. We're going to be talking most about the
political scene in America because we are most familiar with
that, but our observations and conclusions should in some way
apply to what's going on in other White nations as well. And of
course, because the Jewish-led United States seems to have its
dirty fingers in everyone's business all over the world, I hope
that our international listeners will be able to better
understand why the U.S. does what it does in their parts of the
globe. It goes without saying that not everyone in the United
States approves of the actions taken by his government and the
crimes it commits in the name of the American people.

If nothing else, the results of last week's election showed that
the natives in the U.S. are getting restless. Republican senators
and representatives were swept out of office like so much debris,
and the Democrats are preparing to take control of the House of
Representatives for the first time in a long time. The arrogance
of George W. Bush in his handling of the so-called "terrorist
threat" has been partially repaid by the near-ritual sacrifice of
his fellow party busy bees, who are busy now packing their bags
and preparing to head home. I can't help but think that, deep
down, they are glad to leave the stinking rat-trap we call
Washington, D.C.

It was the Iraq war that did it. The war has long been a very
unpopular subject in the American mainstream, and the Democrats
who are heading into office on this wave of voter frustration
have a job to do: somehow "solve" the problem of U.S. involvement
in Iraq. That won't be an easy job for them, and frankly I'm not
expecting much of a change in our Iraq policy even six months
after the new Congress takes over. I hope I'm wrong, but if
there's one thing politicians are good at, it's letting people
down and then blaming others for their shortcomings.

But of course, I really don't know. Maybe the new Congress will
find a quick way to extricate our forces and influence from Iraq.
The Democrats will be chairing all of the committees in the House
and they know that their mandate from the people is to bring the
boys home. I suppose it can be done, but there are just too many
variables in the political arena for me or anyone else to be able
to accurately predict exactly what is going to happen.

But, at the very least, we should all agree that there was no way
that the U.S. was pulling its forces out of Iraq until the
country was leaderless and the Iraqi people were totally sapped
of any outward-directed energy. Now that Saddam Hussein has been
ousted from power and sentenced to hang, and now that the various
power-groups in Iraq are totally focused on their own affairs --
namely, that of waging their own low-level civil war among
themselves -- I think it is possible that we might pull out.

But certainly there was going to be no pull-out until Iraq was a
shambles, and that's because certain elements in the United
States had made up their minds that Saddam Hussein and a vigorous
Iraq were threats to Israel. The Jewish string-pullers up and
down the U.S. media and U.S. government were bound and determined
to grind Saddam into the desert sand, and -- hey -- since they
have the corrupt American politicians in their pocket, why not
get them to send off the men of their constituencies to take care
of Hussein? After all, there was no question that the U.S. forces
would easily destroy Saddam and could then allow Iraq to devolve
into a free-for-all, and then if the corrupt Republican
politicians who supposedly are responsible for the Iraq war get
voted out, who cares? From the Jews' point of view, the job that
needed fixing is now fixed. Send the Republicans packing; it's
time for some new meat, in the form of Democrats.

And the new meat has arrived, and we'll all be watching to see
what they do.

Unfortunately, the people who really need to be called to account
for our involvement in the Iraq war are the very ones who WON'T
be called to account: the Jews who pulled the strings to make it
happen. And when I say "called to account," I don't mean anything
violent or destructive; I just mean that I'd like to see them
removed from their posts of power in the media and government and
sent packing to another place on the planet. How about to Israel?
It seems reasonable since, by all the demonstrated evidence,
that's where their priorities lie.

Anyway, accountability is a tricky thing because sometimes when
it seems someone is being held accountable, really what is
happening is that someone is taking the fall for someone else who
SHOULD be held accountable. Now I don't mean to suggest that the
Republicans who got the boot last week are in no way responsible
for the U.S. involvement in Iraq. They certainly are.

But politicians in this day and age aren't real leaders or
idea-makers; they are just as lemming-like as most average
people. Except where most people are lemming-like in the sense
that they gravitate toward pleasure and material comforts,
politicians are lemming-like in the sense that they gravitate
toward power. And any careful observer knows who holds the reins
of power in this country: the Jewish establishment. That means
that politicians tend to behave in a way that results in some of
that Jewish power coming their way. And sometimes that behavior
backfires on politicians, particularly on the ones who feel like
they have to maintain consistency in their political views.

Let me explain what I mean. After the attacks of 9/11, there
swept through the country a strong desire to make someone pay.
It's a very natural desire, and it has a name: vengeance. The
Jews who run the show in the media world and in the circles of
government saw this wave of energy as their ticket to put an end
to Saddam Hussein and Iraq, the most powerful Middle East
opponent of Israel at the time. So they got most of the American
people and most of the politicians fired up into a war frenzy
that resulted in our troops being sent into Afghanistan first and
then into Iraq. Granted, it took quite a few cooked-up lies over
a rather lengthy period of time to falsely tie Saddam to 9/11,
but by the time the lies became common knowledge, the deed was
done.

Not all of the politicians turned into instant war hawks, of
course, and I'm sure that didn't please the Jews too much, but
enough politicians did -- including the American chief executive
-- and so off the GI Joes and GI Jills went to take care of those
nasty, towel-headed Afghans and Iraqis... at least, that's
essentially what the American-Jewish media told us at the time.

Well, the war didn't last very long (surprise, surprise!) and
then the guerilla war began. Most Americans didn't mind the idea
of our troops rumbling across the desert in Humvees and Bradley
fighting vehicles mowing down hapless Iraqis, but the thought of
our troops milling around Iraq like cattle, having as their only
goal for the day to NOT get shot or blown up... that is something
different altogether. And the longer this
shooting-GI-fish-in-a-barrel business went on, the angrier
Americans got.

But by this time, the Jews couldn't care less about Iraq or about
our soldiers over there. As I mentioned above, the goal that they
had established for Iraq had been achieved, and so the
American-Jewish media has cooled off considerably in their
war-hawk ravings of a few years ago. But many of the Republican
senators and representatives failed to sniff out the change in
the wind, and they continued on their war-hawk course. That
course has now taken many of them and flushed them down the
toilet of political history.

So although it looks like democracy holds people accountable for
their actions, it really doesn't. The stampeding cattle have been
rounded up and sent off to the butcher, but the shysters who
incited the cattle to stampede go off free, with a smirk and a
light heart. Are we to hold cattle responsible for stampeding?
Certainly they need to be rounded up so that they don't destroy
people or property, but I think we should all agree that those
who got the cattle into an agitated state are more deserving of
punitive action.

Speaking of punitive action, I'm sure that many of you listening
in have heard about the lawsuit directed against more than a
dozen high-ranking U.S. officials for their individual roles in
the treatment of prisoners at various detention centers. These
detention centers, such as the one at Guantanomo Bay, Cuba as
well as others in Iraq and elsewhere, hold so-called "terrorists"
or suspected terrorists, often for months or years at a time with
little or no evidence to support their detainment.

The lawsuit, which was launched by a group in Germany, is an
attempt to call to account some of those responsible for the
questionable interrogation techniques used in the attempt to
extract information from prisoners. Such techniques include
forced nudity, sexual humiliation, sleep deprivation,
uncomfortable body positions for extended periods of time, and
many others. The biggest and most well-known of the defendants in
that lawsuit is former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld,
but also mentioned is former CIA director George Tenet.

The Bush administration, naturally, has refused to acknowledge
any jurisdiction on the part of the International Criminal Court
(ICC) on the grounds that U.S. officials may be unjustly
prosecuted. I am doubtful that the lawsuit will go anywhere,
simply because George Bush and those around him honestly believe
that they can do whatever they want to do and shouldn't have to
be called to account. Interesting, isn't it, how it is okay to
call some people to account, but not others?

Saddam Hussein was called to account. His dream of a Middle East
that didn't have to knuckle under to Israel all the time didn't
jibe with the will of the Jewish-American establishment. And so
the U.S. bombed his country into a sandy mess, captured him,
oversaw Saddam's Iraqi countrymen put him through a kangaroo
trial, and now appear to be set to provide security for the
carrying out of Saddam's hanging sentence.

Slobodan Milosevic was called to account. His dream of a Serbia
for Serbs rubbed the Jewish establishment the wrong way, and
that's because unified White ethnicities are bad for Jews, and
therefore any unified White ethnicity is a no-no. Some of you may
have forgotten that it is mixed-race cosmopolitanism that is good
for Jews. And so NATO bombed Serbia into submission. Problem
"solved."

For several years now, Iran has been the main international focus
of Jewish-American hatred. True, North Korea has taken some flak
from George Bush and company, but in comparing the volume of news
dealing with North Korea in the American media with that of Iran,
there is no comparison. Iran takes the prize by a wide margin,
even though -- from what I gather from news reports -- North
Korea is actually much closer to becoming a nuclear power than is
Iran.

My hypothesis as to why Iran is getting so much attention in the
U.S. is that the men who control most of the American media have
strong ties to a country that sees Iran as a threat. That
country, of course, is Israel, and only time will tell whether
Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinijad will be called to account
for snubbing his nose at the Jewish-led U.S.

So it is ironic that George Bush and company snort in derision
when a lawsuit out of Germany targets some of his closest
advisors and confidants. In his mind, Rumsfeld and Tenet and the
rest were just doing what needed to be done. The end, in his
mind, justified the means, and the fact that his means only push
HIS OWN stated goal farther and farther away doesn't occur to
him.

It would be very nice if President Bush could get this idea
through his thick skull: Nothing is more true than the fact that
trying to stamp out the so-called "Islamic terrorists" without
addressing the basic reason that the Arabic world hates the U.S.
-- namely, America's complete worship of Israel and complete
disrespect for the Arabs -- is the most futile of endeavors. The
attempt to bully and dominate the entire Arabic race with
military power is complete nonsense, as the catastrophe of Iraq
has clearly shown.

But George Bush isn't about to send Israel on its way, and he
laughingly dismisses any attempt to call his cronies to account.
Furthermore, it never occurs to him that he might ever be called
to account for anything. He honestly believes that he hasn't done
anything wrong. And really, it depends on one's viewpoint whether
or not he has.

Is it wrong to lie, not once or twice, but over and over and over
again, in order to stir up animosity against a strong leader like
Saddam Hussein, who wants merely to run his own country in his
own way?

Is it wrong to invade a sovereign nation like Iraq, a nation that
hadn't attacked ours or damaged it in any way except to say
things that some Americans didn't want to hear?

Is it wrong to squander the life and wealth of one's own nation
to destroy the enemy of another, without receiving some kind of
compensation from the "saved" nation, namely Israel? And even if
there were some sort of compensation from Israel, some sort of
benefit for the U.S. -- which there isn't -- shouldn't those
alleged benefits at least be weighed against the multitude of
risks that have resulted due to our backing of Israel to the
point of exhaustion?

And what are some of those risks? Wasting our technology,
resources, and tax dollars. Alienating essentially all of the
Arab world, a world that sits atop the largest known reservoirs
of crude oil. Earning the ridicule of the perceptive portion of
the rest of the world, who see the U.S. for what it is: the bully
boy for Israel. And worst of all, sullying the honor of the White
man and the sense of fairness that is instinctual in us. All of
this, in exchange for what? Nothing.

Some of you may know that last Saturday, U.S. ambassador to the
United Nations John Bolton vetoed a U.N. Security Council
condemnation of Israel's most recent military actions in Gaza.
Ten nations voted in favor of the resolution, four abstained, and
only one -- Israel's bully boy, the good ol' USA -- voted
against. This is the second time this year that the U.S. has shot
down a U.N. draft resolution containing a reprimand of Israel.

You may have seen the AP photograph showing Bolton, with furrowed
brow and stern countenance, pitcher of ice water close at hand,
raising his right hand to officially register his opposition to
the resolution. A more blatant and in-your-face rejection of
international cooperation can scarcely be imagined. I can just
picture the other delegates at the moment Bolton registered his
vote, snorting in contempt and rolling their eyes, then glancing
around at each other with knowing looks that say, "Check it out.
The most powerful nation on Earth doesn't have brains OR balls."
It's absolutely disgusting.

We'll have to see how the political climate changes after January
when the Democrats roll into Washington, but one thing is sure:
There will be no wavering on at least one issue, and that is that
the U.S. will back Israel every time. That's one thing the
homogeneous White homeland that we in the National Alliance
envision WON'T be doing.

So it's time to quit worrying about holding our anti-leaders
accountable for leading us by the nose into the inferno. What
it's really time for -- what we in the National Alliance believe
it is time for -- is for the White people worldwide who CARE
about the truth, about honor, and about the fate of their race to
hold THEMSELVES accountable for the world we live in and the
world we want to create. Accept responsibility and join forces
with us; there's a lot of work to do.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of
ADV-list.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

==> To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to this mailing list go here:
http://www.natvan.com/mailing-list/

==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. 
This 
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to
be 
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup
posting.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

SUBSCRIBE to NATIONAL VANGUARD, our unique, thought-provoking 
magazine -- $22 US, $30 Canada, and $40 Foreign.
This is for six high-quality, glossy color issues:

SEND $3 for our 88-page CATALOG of books and other items:

     National Vanguard Books
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Donations are needed to keep this program on the air. Give $20
today!
http://www.natvanbooks.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_prod.html?p_prodid=599

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

To report typos and technical errors in ADV-list or our web site,
please write to:
 webmaster@natvan.com   (Subject: TYPO)

The National Alliance: www.natvan.com & www.natall.com
National Vanguard Books: www.natvanbooks.com

(c) 2006 National Vanguard Books