Texas and Gaza: Land and Race

American Dissident Voices Broadcast of August 20, 2005

Hello and welcome to American Dissident Voices, I'm Shaun Walker.

This week the media have again shown their Jewish bias with two
similar events. The issue surrounding these events is group
identity and conflict, but the media doesn't report it as such.
I'm not surprised, because the majority of the people that work
for the US media are not capable of deep, socio-political
understanding. Dr. Pierce used to affectionately call these
people "lemmings", and lemmings they are. They earn a paycheck
for the stories they write and, the more sensational the story,
the more chance it can get published in full. And if the story is
eye-catching enough, it might make front page headlines.

The world-wide media exposure to the Jewish surrender of the Gaza
Strip in Israel is the biggest media event this week. At the same
time, a similar event took place in Texas. You might have missed
this news story if you blinked. It did get some exposure, but
absolutely nothing in depth and no White person who actually
cares about White people was interviewed by the media. With
nearly 200 million Whites in America -- the greatest number of
White people in any country on the planet -- not one was asked
their opinion about the milestone to our race's decline in Texas.
The news stories all sounded about the same, brief and
emotionless. They were written from the mentality of an
occupational army that was rubbing our noses in the fact that now
that they have controlled our country for so long and their
racial agenda is well on track. And they were gloating over the
fact that the White race is declining and Texas, the second
largest state by size and by population, now has a non-White
majority. The articles avoided the race issues, while blatantly
pointing out how rapidly the White race is losing America. Let me
quote for you the very short blurb written this week in the
influential international news magazine, The Economist.

I quote, "The Census Bureau reported that, thanks to a continuing
influx of Latinos, Texas has become the fourth state in America
to have a majority non-White population." That was all that was
written about this extremely important event in this 88-page
weekly publication. Did you catch the media rhetoric within that
short blurb? There was only one bit of creative journalism in the
entire 26-word paragraph. Let me quote that bit of rhetoric
again, "thanks to the continuing influx of Latinos."

Who the hell are they kidding? Besides Tyson's Food and other
Whites who want to exploit non-White, cheap labor, what other
White person is happy about having even more Mexicans in America?
Every poll in the country, even by the most Marxist-Liberal poll
sponsors show that about 90% of all Whites in America want to
close the border and deport the ones that are here. The majority
of Negroes and even the majority of Hispanics that are here want
to close the border. So, who the hell was the Jew or wanna-be-Jew
at The Economist that wrote, "thanks to the continuing influx of
Latinos" in this news snippet? This lemming-like reporter is
thankful that White people have been overwhelmed and dispossessed
of the state of Texas. He thinks, or at least wants the readers
to think, that this is a positive outcome. So, in Texas, millions
of White people search for a Whiter neighborhood to live in or
they give up and leave Texas. But, this reporter wants to put a
positive spin on the story and that is the end of the matter.

I wonder if whoever wrote this stupid snippet has ever been to
Texas. Perhaps he visited the River Walk in San Antonio and
enjoyed the fine dining there. What this reporter should have
done, was walk about a mile north of or south of or east of the
River Walk. It really wouldn't matter what direction he went; all
directions take you into a Mexican slum. The writing changes
quickly from English and the trendy "Spanglish" that the
restaurant owners use, in which they mix a little bit of Spanish
with English. Then, just a few blocks away from the river, you
come to Neo-Mexico, where everything is written in Spanish, where
the Corona beer bottles, soiled diapers, and empty salsa bottles
litter the area. The spray-painted graffiti is in Spanish as
well. The joys of multi-culturalism are abundant in such areas.
And, more than this, the racial conflict is right there at the
surface. The best way to see this is by the looks that people
give to one another. The Mexicans, in their newly won territory,
often through many violent acts, are quite defensive of their
territory. Hispanic comedians in America boast about how violent
the Mexican gangs are and how unsafe it is for an "Anglo" or a
"Gringo" to go into a newly created Mexican ghetto, called a
"Barrio."

The reporter for The Economist won't do an in depth story on how
great Texas was when it was White and how screwed up it is now
with over half the state being non-White. And these lemming
reporters will not talk about the racial hostility from the
non-Whites. They want to brainwash the public into believing this
is a good thing. Yes sir, "Thanks to the Latino influx," Texas is
now a sewer. What do the America politicians do about this?

Of course, in Texas there is a small village that is missing its
idiot because he is currently in the White House. From the town
of Crawford, Texas, the biggest race-traitor of them all comes.
Instead of rallying the White people to create a clear,
overwhelming majority of votes from the Whites alone, George W.
Bush would rather cater to the Mexicans. The Republicans can't
scramble quick enough to tell us how important the Mexicans are,
but this is just false. Even from their almighty voting results,
this is still false. The Whites will still constitute the
majority of Texas voters for this year and several more years,
but instead of doing something to help the Whites, George W. Bush
takes actions that will directly harm White people.

Now, let's compare this terrible event in Texas that The
Economist is happy about. Let's look at Gaza. The Gaza strip was
surrendered by Egypt in exchange for the return of the Sinai
Peninsula, a peace treaty with Israel, and billions of US
dollars. Essentially, the Jews were able to wage an aggressive
war against all their neighbors in 1967 and, after giving back
the Sinai, they were allowed to keep the Gaza strip from Egypt,
the West Bank from Jordan, and the Golan Heights from Syria.

But, not all is well in Israel. In fact, Jews are not just an
international criminal enterprise -- they are much worse. When
you get millions of Jews to settle down together, because the
rest of the planet eventually tries to kill them off everywhere
else they lived, continuously since Jews were invented; the Jews
can't even make their own country work.

Israel is a mad-house and as current trends look, Israel won't
exist in 100 years. Personally, I have mixed feelings about the
matter. On the one hand, I don't want a Jewish state to have
nuclear weapons, which they do. The precedence has been now set
to make it acceptable to go to war against Middle-Eastern
countries if they are suspected of having "Weapons of Mass
Destruction," so the 400 or so nuclear bombs that Israel has
might prompt action later in that regard. But, even if we were to
remove Israel's nuclear threat, they still would be a safe haven
for the Mossad and other terrorist groups. Let's say, in a
perfect world, Israel could be isolated from the White world and
pose no threat. This situation is a good one because then this
gives the other Jews a place to go to. I know Napoleon, like all
great leaders, was sick to death of the Jews. Napoleon came up
with the idea of sending them all to Madagascar. That isn't a bad
idea, but I can't think of anything that the furry little lemurs
ever did wrong to deserve an island full of Jews. And the fact
is, the Jews are already in that region of Palestine. If you
watch what is going on in Israel, it really is their own
self-created Hell on earth. Personally, I think we should let
them have the damn strip of land. With the Israelis being such a
hodge-podge of religious and non-religious groups, they will
neutralize their crimes against Whites with pointless debates and
infighting. Jews, as a race, require an outside enemy that they
can infiltrate and corrupt or they unravel. It is a component of
their genetic make-up. A cuckoo bird needs to use the nest of
another bird to lay its eggs, in a very parasitic fashion, and
Jews need a host nation to steal from. Jews, as a people, are not
really complete unless they are involved in harming another
nation's morality and traditions. It is a part of what makes Jews
tick. It, in itself, would make an interesting study in human
social obligate-host-parasite relations on a macro-national
scale. But, I'm doubtful the Ford Foundation will donate the
money for such a study today. That can come later.

In essence, Jews infighting in Israel is ultimately helpful for
the White race. They don't harm us as much when they are busy
debating whether or not it should be legal to turn on a
light-switch on Saturday. Actually, it's good to allow Jews
enough rope to hang themselves.

If we look at the Jewish state's decline since 1967, it really
becomes obvious. Keep in mind the powerful words of wisdom spoken
by the greatest nineteenth century German statesman, Otto Von
Bismarck. What Bismarck said was this. "Any nation that
voluntarily cedes territory is a nation in decline." No truer
words of wisdom have been spoken. This of course included America
and the illegal and immoral act of giving away our Panama Canal
Zone. This, of course, will be reversed when Whites retake
control of America. Personally, I really like our Canal Zone.
This was the only real triple-canopy jungle in American territory
and I loved snorkeling in the canal. For those Americans that
never visited our canal zone, it is a beautiful place, with the
most exotic wildlife, from Tree-Sloths to Howler monkeys, and I
wish to visit there again, with it belonging to us again. But,
I'm digressing.

My point was this. America giving away the canal was an act of
self-mutilation. Israel giving away the Gaza is also
self-mutilation. It shows how much narrow-mindedness,
selfishness, and lack of national wherewithal there is within the
Jewish national character. The Israeli media is not dominated by
a group of Germans or Swedes, so their media is 100% Jewish-owned
and edited. Yet, the Jews on a whole have sold out the fate of
all their fellow Jews in Gaza. They have basically said "Well, Oi
Vey, I don't live in Gaza and with all those non-Jews, I don't
even want to visit Gaza, let's just give it away to our sworn
enemies." This is the sentiment of the majority of Israelis and
Israel will not exist in 100 years because Jews are Jews. Jews
have evolved, as a unique genetic stock of people who have a
wholly parasitic behavior. They are great at playing divide and
conquer; it is what they do. When they have their own nation,
they can't stop themselves and they do it even to themselves.
Jews are not a superior race. They are far from it. Jews are
clever, persuasive, and manipulative. They are a natural-born
race of used-car salesmen, but they can't even figure out how to
play Cowboys and Indians in their own country.

Just as our conquered White people in our land of Texas are
demoralized and don't fight back against the onslaught of the
Mestizos, the Jews have no national consciousness to make Israel
more Israeli. And this is with Jews controlling 100% of the media
in their own country without any prevalent institution of
thought-controlling taboos, such as "Political Correctness." In
fact, the White men and women are lately showing many positive
signs of racial consciousness and the desire to retake the state
of Texas back from the Mexican invaders. We did it once, with our
people being a small minority; we can do it again, and I believe
we will retake Texas. I can't really say who the next generation
of the Sam Houstons, Bowies, Crocketts, and Austins will be. But,
our race is slowly waking up and the Jews are surrendering their
territory and forcibly pushing out their own people.

In Israel, it is ironic, too, that these Gaza Jews are made up of
many of same settlers that had lived on the Sinai Peninsula and
were forcibly evacuated in 1982. I remember watching scenes on TV
back then and wondering what type of stupid, self-hating people
could force their own countrymen to leave their homes and give
the land to their sworn enemy? Many of those settlers made their
home in Gaza with the promise from the Israeli government that
they were to own Gaza forever, a land that their god had "given"
to them. It would appear their own god doesn't like Jews because
they just gave it away.

On the cover of this week's issue of The Economist is a picture
of some Jewish families walking down a paved road with the
caption, "Goodbye to Gaza." Now, let's look at the rhetoric
there. Instead of saying, "Hello to Gaza," from a Palestinian's
perspective, they say "goodbye" as if the rest of the world
actually cares about the Jews' misfortune. I mean think about it,
who in China feels a drop of sympathy towards these Jews that
just lost Gaza? Who in Columbia cried over the fact? Who in
Romania is going to send aid to these Jews? Name one American
farmer, rancher, auto-worker, or plumber that cares in the
slightest for these Jews? The fact is, besides the people that
control The Economist and other Zionist publications, no one
cares. The world has really grown tired of Jews crying wolf or
begging for more money.

And yet at the same time, picture the lemmings at The Economist
publishing the following: Picture the cover of this week's issue
with a picture of beautiful White families walking down a highway
with the caption of "Goodbye to Texas." Imagine how that would
effect White people. I mean, think about it. The rage is right
there under the surface with White people. If Time magazine or
Newsweek would veer off the Jewish course just for a moment and
let the cat out of the bag and provide White people in America
with the unrestrained truth, this country would smoke. White
people would stop and think about it a bit more. They would
wonder if we are forced out of Texas, then where next? And
millions and millions of the already racially aware, yet
politically dormant, White people in America would start asking
questions and start looking for answers. Little ol' Juan and
Felipe wouldn't look so smug from inside their taco-stand at that
point.

I have looked at this week's cover of The Economist and thought
of many other captions that could have been used. The first one
that came to mind was "Goodbye and good riddance." Or, "don't let
the door hit you on the way out Jew Boy." Maybe they could have
even used, "Here today, gone tomorrow." And, last but not least,
"Who needs Germans, the Jews will do it to themselves."

I had an Israeli TV executive here at our National Office in
March. The entire film crew was from Israel. They were very
typical Jews with that special type of Jewish arrogance and
attitude that eventually drives world leaders to imagine shipping
them all to Madagascar. When these Jews were here and when they
turned off their cameras, they liked to taunt me with little digs
about how America is lost. They kept laughing and telling me
about all the Negroes and Mexicans pouring into America and how
we, the White race, had no resolve to stop it. These Israelis
loved to rub my nose in the fact that they, the Jews, control the
US media. They were very open about it, even boastful in the
arrogant Jewish manner.

Now, the next time I run across one of these hooked-nose Semites
I'm going to say: "So, have you visited Gaza lately?" I hear that
Moe's House of Matzoh Balls had to relocate to Tel Aviv. I bet
those Palestinians are enjoying walking on the beach that your
god gave to you, but your stupid politicians gave to your sworn
enemies, Jew Boy."

The Jews have lost Gaza and with over a million Muslim-Israelis
in Israel proper, it is just a matter of time before they lose
the rest of the country. It is poetic karma. The Jews have earned
nothing and the Jews will end up with nothing. Until then, we
must figure out a way to remove those Jewish nuclear bombs. Those
truly do pose an international threat to the entire planet.

The fight for Texas has just begun. I have family in Texas. I
love Texas. Texas is a White homeland and we sure as hell are not
giving up Texas like a bunch of self-hating Jews gave away Gaza.
Let this be a wake-up call to the proud White men and women of
the sovereign state of Texas. Let this be a wake up call to all
White men and women in America and all over the world. The
non-Whites want everything we have. If we settled on the moon,
and we eventually will, then we will turn the moon into an Aryan
paradise, complete with the most beautiful women ever to exist,
the most high-tech innovations, the greatest standard of living,
health care, and education. Then, the brown Mexicans would try to
hop that border too. There would literally be Mexican illegal
aliens trying to stow away on space-crafts. It isn't a matter of
what body of land is here or there. The people from India do not
pour into England because it is geographically convenient. The
non-Whites pour into White countries because we are greater than
they are and they envy what we build up and what we will always
have. They wish they could be White and they greatly desire to
live at a White standard. They know they cannot do this in their
own countries surrounded by people of their own race, so they
abandon their countries and try to live amongst the White race.
Well, that is really too bad. Such an arrangement is killing the
goose that lays the golden eggs. History proves that Whites must
have well-controlled borders and non-Whites cannot live amongst
us.

Let Texas be a wake-up call. Tell other Whites everywhere about
what happened in Texas, what happened in California, what
happened in Rhodesia, and in South Africa. The Texans used the
battle cry, "Remember the Alamo." We all, every White, need to
remember Texas and we need to retake Texas for our race again.

For a White Texas, this is Shaun Walker with the National
Alliance.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of
ADV-list.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

==> To subscribe send an e-mail message to:
adv-list-request@NatVan.com
The subject of the message should be: Subscribe

==>  TO BE REMOVED send an e-mail message to:
adv-list-request@NatVan.com
The subject of the message should be: Unsubscribe

==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. 
This 
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to
be 
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup
posting.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

To report typos and technical errors in ADV-list or our web site,
please write to: webmaster@natvan.com

To contact us via "snail mail," write to:
     National Vanguard Books
     Attention:  ADVlist
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946

The National Alliance:  http://www.natvan.com
                        http://www.natall.com

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Donations are needed to keep this program on the air. Please give
$20 today:
http://www.natvanbooks.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_prod.html?p_prodid=599

Subscribe to our unique, thought-provoking magazine NATIONAL
VANGUARD. Only $18 for six high-quality, glossy color issues:
http://www.natvanbooks.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_prod.html?p_prodid=758

(c)  National Vanguard Books 2005