A recipe for trouble.
Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of the National Alliance. I'm your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.
If you've been tuning in to these American Dissident Voices broadcasts for any length of time, you are well aware that the program of the National Alliance is geared toward achieving complete independence for the White race. The main thing we want now is a White homeland -- that is, a White nation that has a White government guided by the racialist principles of the National Alliance. But that White homeland will have a lot of other perks that our society today doesn't have, besides a population that is racially homogeneous. We'll have a White media of news and entertainment, White standards of behavior and excellence, White art and music, and a White economy.
In short, ours will be a White culture from top to bottom, and that's going to be a pretty exciting development for hundreds of millions of White people around the globe. And many of those Whites who are going to be most excited are the ones who are sick to death of the present, degenerate, multicultural society but are too chicken to stand up with the rest of us in protest. Of course, the attainment of that White racial homeland would be made much easier -- and realized that much more quickly -- if these bashful ones would voice their support for us TODAY, instead of after the battle for the homeland has already been won. If today you find yourself among the bashful, consider a change of heart in defense of the race that created Western civilization through its hard work, its literature, its science, and -- yes -- its willingness to fight like the devil when necessary.
Only a fool can deny that diversity's main product in this country is conflict and strife. More racially homogeneous White nations, such as some in Northern Europe, don't have nearly the degree of interracial bickering, interracial finger-pointing, and interracial crime that more racially-diverse countries like the United States have. And developments in recent decades have shown that as those Northern European countries become, like the United States, more and more ethnically diverse, they too are beginning to experience the same kind of insanity that has gripped America for many decades now.
The fact of the matter is that comparatively few White people actually ENJOY racial diversity. The problems that diversity brings are so numerous and so destabilizing that its effect on a society cannot help but be negative. And the negative effects that I'm talking about here are the so-called "peaceful" ones: the disruption in the workplace and in the schools due to people not speaking the same language; the many religious practices and customs of newcomers that call into question the religion and customs of the host population; legal issues -- "glitches" in the legal code, you might call them -- that are associated with the customs of newcomers; and, not least of all, the breaking down of the feeling of unity between the inhabitants of a local area, and certainly nationwide. All of these are "problems of peace" that don't necessarily hurt any particular individual but that nonetheless cause stress among people.
And once we add to the "problems of peace" the "problems of conflict," we really have a monster on our hands. Problems of conflict include interracial crime; so-called affirmative action and equal opportunity; racial discrimination, both blatant and subtle; and active pockets of racial resistance to the established order, such as drug gangs and crime cartels that are generally racial in composition.
Neither the problems of peace nor the problems of conflict get at the root of the issue for White racialists, however. Our overriding perspective is that all racial integration violates the purpose of our people, which is to become better and better through biological evolution. Biological evolution has gotten us this far, and in the process has differentiated us from every other race on the planet, and we want to go yet farther along that path. White racialists object to miscegenation and every other variety of race-mixing on this basis alone, but we push the "problems of peace" and the "problems of conflict" to a wider and more general White audience in an effort to build our struggle and to exert more influence on everything that takes place in our society. But, at root, it is all about biological evolution for us White racialists.
So, although most White people aren't particularly fond of racial diversity, nearly all of them tolerate it without much complaint, mainly because they are aware of the great social pressure -- led by the Jewish media -- that is exerted on anyone who doesn't seem to be toeing the multicultural line with enough enthusiasm. It is true that quite a few of these status-quo Whites enjoy the availability of different cuisines like Chinese or Mexican food, but -- if push came to shove -- my contention is that most would choose racial homogeneity over diversity. The problem is that White people worldwide don't feel as if racial homogeneity lies within the realm of possible choices. That's just how the Jewish media want to keep things. And by restricting the public's range of ideas that are considered as possible, the Jewish media perpetuate the injustices inflicted by one race on another, both on an individual basis and on whole races as well.
There isn't a day that goes by when the large-scale, Jewish media in this country don't harp about some injustice done to non-Whites by Whites. Whether it is National Socialist Germany during the Second World War or the Civil Rights Era or Martin Luther King or the lower test scores among Black students as compared to every other racial group, everything boils down to White racism. Every single day on the televisions and movie screens of America, White viewers are pumped full of racial guilt and self-hatred for alleged injustices of the past and present. Every day, every student in every public school in the United States is taught that Whites are the aggressors, the slave-owners, the liars and deceivers, and that every non-White race -- Black, Jewish, Hispanic, Indian, and so on -- is the victim of the White oppressors. The air is so thick with the stench of the false notion of White guilt that one can't get away from it.
As I've said, it is my contention that most White people would rather not be bothered by all of this "diversity" nonsense. Most Whites get a little nervous when they hop into a taxicab driven by a Middle Easterner who, after communicating with the White passenger in English as to the desired destination, then spends the rest of the cab drive jabbering on his Blue Tooth in some language of the Near or Middle East to one of his racial kinsmen about god-knows-what. Most Whites feel uncomfortable when they go to the shopping centers and find themselves surrounded on all sides by seemingly endless numbers of non-Whites who, like the Whites, are just out shopping or wasting time. It's not that the average White becomes the prey for criminal-minded non-Whites every single time he goes out in public. There IS a non-White crime problem, but that isn't a motivating factor for most White people. But the point here is that multiculturalism is something that most Whites would be quite happy to do without.
For every sob story on television about this or that alleged injustice against non-Whites perpetrated by Whites, it is worth wondering whether or not that alleged injustice would have occurred if the races had been separated into unique, monoracial homelands. For example, would the injustices that the Germans allegedly committed against the Jews during the National Socialist era in Germany have occurred if there had been no Jews in Germany to begin with? And on the other side of the coin, would the injustices that the Jews allegedly committed against the Germans before the National Socialists took power have occurred if there had been no Jews in Germany? Would the so-called "injustice" of expelling the Jews -- which has been done at least once by nearly every Western nation down through history -- have occurred if the Jews had simply taken some turf of their own and STAYED there, instead of butting in and sucking the lifeblood out of all of those Gentile nations?
The answer to these questions is obvious, and it's the same for every question: No, the alleged injustices would not have occurred if the various races had been separated to begin with.
The list of conflicts between individuals of various races and between large masses of various races throughout history is practically infinite. I've heard thousands of stories of oppression by the Germans during the Second World War; such stories are one of the things the Jewish media masters of this country have mastered, and they do their best to ensure that every American of every age hears dozens of them every year. But the atrocities committed against the German civilian population by the Soviets, for example, and the willed deaths of perhaps a million German prisoners of war under the eye of General Eisenhower at the end of the fighting -- as documented in the book Other Losses, by the Canadian James Bacque -- are almost never discussed. There are two sides to every story, and the Jewish media don't want you to hear the German side.
All of the discrimination by Whites against Blacks throughout American history is another favorite subject of those who have taken it upon themselves to soak the White race in guilt. Not mentioned are the grossly-disproportionate interracial crime statistics, which show that Black-on-White crime is many times more prevalent than White-on-Black crime. "Everyone hates the Jews," we're told, and we are given lots of specific examples, including documentary evidence and eyewitness interviews, to prove it. But never are we drowned in the facts about what might be called the "faceless" Jewish crimes against the American population: the moral filth that sweeps across the TV and movie screens, the alien musical garbage that blares from every stereo in America, and the financial chaos dumped on thousands of people by high-stakes Jewish swindlers like Ivan Boesky and Michael Milken.
So I'm not here today to tell you that on the Eastern Front during the Second World War, the German SS never dealt harshly with Communist partisans. I'm not here to tell you that White people in the South during the Civil Rights Era never beat the living daylights out of Black agitators or White integrationists. Whenever different races are unnaturally forced into mutual contact, there is bound to be trouble. And there is bound to be injustice, committed by each side against the other. Given that fact, what now is to be done?
Well, the Jewish establishment in the West generally and in the United States in particular has been pushing the idea that the solution MUST be more and more and MORE mutual contact, and that contact must be forced onto the people by the power of law, if necessary. In other words, their answer to the problems that arise when the races come into contact is to demand MORE contact. When looked at in this light, this Jewish proposal is the biggest damn-fool stupid notion ever conceived. That's like saying that you can solve the pain problem that arose due to your not being careful with a knife and slicing your finger…by slicing away some more. Slice all of your fingers, and your hands, too!
Yes, and also your wrist lengthwise, because that's just about what our race is allowing to be done to it…and the end result for the individual with a slit wrist is what lies ahead for our race unless we stand up and do something about it.
The National Alliance's solution is much simpler: Separate the races. The mixing-of-the-races policy doesn't work. History shows this; our present experience shows this; common sense shows this. Racial separation is, as the saying goes, a no-brainer. And besides racial separation being the simplest and most obvious solution…deep down, most White people would welcome it.
The problem lies in getting our kinsmen to break out of the rut and ACT to make it happen. Most of us want racial separation, but few of us have the courage to stand up and say so in this day and age of Political Correctness and Jewish media pressure.
This refusal to do what NEEDS to be done and what most people WANT to be done is perhaps the most fundamental problem facing our people today. The low White birthrate relative to the other races is a problem. The high rate of miscegenation between Whites and non-Whites is a problem. The turning-over of the economies of White nations to the numberless hordes of non-Whites in the farthest reaches of Asia is a problem.
But these problems are nothing compared with our inability to summon our will to ACT. With the will to act, all of our other problems fall within our reach and become solvable.
Racial separation IS the high moral ground. Now, all we have to do is find the will to achieve it. I'd welcome your help in doing just that. Contact the National Alliance today and make a contribution to pulling our people out of the rut of indecisiveness and inaction.
I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.
