A Serbian church in Kosovo.




Hello, and welcome to this week's edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of the National Alliance. I'm your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Well, it was another interesting week in politics, so I'd like to begin this broadcast with a few thoughts on that subject. On the one hand, we had Hillary Clinton making a desperate attempt to win the Democratic primaries in the key states of Texas and Ohio. Hillary, sensing now a real challenge from Barack Obama that isn't going to go away, has been trying to allay the fears of her supporters that Obama has the momentum and is ready to ride the wave into the November election. As intelligent and articulate as Hillary is, she has made some tactical errors in attacking her Democratic opponent, and now lags behind the Black candidate among White males and liberals. The pieces of the demographic puzzle that support Hillary are White women and those voters over 65, which -- as she and everybody else well knows -- doesn't bode well for her campaign in the coming months. If Hillary loses to Obama in Ohio and Texas, her run for the White House is probably over. That would make things very interesting in November: the Black Obama against the White John McCain.

In stark contrast to Clinton, Obama is heady with the media's attention and the total backing of his Black supporters, and he exudes the confidence of one who appears poised to be the next Democratic presidential candidate. He has been using his polished way with words to maintain the perception that he is the only candidate with a real vision: the only one who offers the possibility of real change for America. The focus of Obama's campaign, in contrast to Clinton's rather erratic one, has been noticed by the more intelligent lemmings who pay attention to what's going on, and the poll numbers are showing Obama's camp growing while Clinton's is shrinking. This past week, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan went so far as to call Obama the hope of the world. Amazing; who would have guessed that a Black leader like Farrakhan, speaking to a primarily Black audience, would laud the credentials of the Black candidate Barack Obama? All of Hillary's wooing of the Black vote in elections past is now being repaid by the near-total turning-away of the Black population from her candidacy. In the primaries, anyway, the Black vote goes to the Black candidate.

And then there's John McCain, relieved that he will be his party's candidate in November. McCain, who finds himself trailing Obama in national polls by a significant 10-point margin, is -- as I said last week -- hardly a man that White people would be proud to have in the White House to re-establish a sense of racial sanity in America. For a White man to even think about legalizing the millions upon millions of illegal immigrants automatically discredits him as having the soul of a White man. So McCain is no different from the others, and therefore it makes absolutely no difference who wins the Democratic candidacy and, eventually, the election.

So what are White people who care about their race supposed to do about the election? Voting certainly won't make a difference. First of all, there is no one to vote for and secondly, if there were, your vote would be canceled out by the vote of the dumbest, most unthinking, materialistic, and egocentric lemming. When their vote counts just as much as yours, there is no hope for salvation for our people through the democratic process.

The best we can hope for is for the farce that IS modern mass-media-driven democracy to become more and more apparent to thinking Whites as the election draws nearer. We can hope that Obama does indeed secure the Democratic nomination and then watch as the Jewish-dominated media try to smooth out any rough spots in the realization that a Black man could be our next President. We can hope that McCain, in trying to out-do the eloquent Obama in promising everything to everybody, will make the shallowness and truly pathetic nature of modern democracy ever more obvious. We can hope that by the mere fact that a Black man is a front-runner for the Presidency that a few more White people wake up from their sports shows and their sit-coms and think about the future, even for two minutes. That's asking a lot from the couch potatoes, I know, but we've got to start somewhere.

And lastly, we can hope that conditions in America tilt in our favor. Things are going that way, with $100 barrels of oil, the home mortgage crisis, the immigration crisis, and the economy in general going south. Couple that with the blatant multiculturalism -- with non-Whites in every movie, on every TV show, in every advertisement, in every athletic event, and in every school, church, and workplace -- and I can't help but be optimistic that the American White population might reach a breaking point in the near future. White racialists have had those hopes dashed in the past many times -- when, time after time, the White population proved that it had no qualms about rolling over and taking another Jewish swat on the backside rather than stand up like White men and halt the insanity -- but all we can do is work for that day and hope for the best. If this bizarre election starts that ball rolling, then it is a welcome event.

And the fact of the matter is that it doesn't really matter who wins in November. All honest observers know that it is the manipulative power of the predominantly-Jewish media that governs the direction that the country takes. The person in the White House might be the point man; he (or she) might take the credit or the heat for what is happening throughout the country, but it is the collective Jewish power in the United States that determines where the ship of state goes and what those aboard think and feel and do.

Consider if Al Gore had won the election in 2000 and 9/11 had occurred as it did. Do you think American troops would NOT be in Iraq and Afghanistan? Would TV news anchors NOT be talking about legalizing the 15 or 20 million criminals who are wandering around our cities and countrysides? Would the United States NOT be hounding independent-minded nations such as Iran? You and I both know the answer to those questions, and the inescapable conclusion is that it doesn't matter who is in the White House: the Jews manipulate that person just like they manipulate the entire country with their vast media power.

But the main subject for this broadcast is what happened in Kosovo over the last couple of weeks. Although the history of what used to be Yugoslavia is long and far too complicated to go into much detail here, what IS relevant is that Kosovo has long been considered by Serbs to be a part of Serbia -- even though Kosovo is now 90% Albanian -- just as Los Angeles is considered by Americans to be a part of America, despite its present immense Mexican population.

But in Kosovo, the Albanians have wanted to break away from Serbia proper for quite a while now. This desire for an independent Kosovo with an Albanian majority led to the Albanian separatist groups (the most prominent being the Kosovo Liberation Army) agitating so much back during the Clinton presidency in the late '90s that Slobodan Milosevic sent Serbian troops into the region to put down what amounted to an Albanian separatist rebellion. As you know, the media reported all of the so-called atrocities committed by the Serbs against the allegedly peace-loving Albanians, but those media refrained from reporting equally-distasteful atrocities committed by Albanians against Serbs.

You might remember that Clinton, in an effort to prevent Milosevic's Serbian forces from maintaining order in their own country, sent in the bombers to smash the living daylights out of the Serbs. After some brief holding out, the Serbs had no choice but to relent. The Albanian separatists didn't secure an independent Kosovo -- after the war, the UN acknowledged that Serbia maintained its sovereignty over Kosovo, at least on paper -- but they did succeed in getting the region put into the hands of the United Nations peacekeepers, who have been artificially propping up Kosovo ever since. Following the end of the fighting, many of the Albanian refugees who had been driven out before and during the war made their way back to Kosovo.

To give you an idea about what happened in Kosovo during the Clinton Era, let's imagine the hypothetical situation in which all of the Mexicans living from Los Angeles to San Diego decide that they want to turn the region into a separate country. Let's say that the Mexican separatist groups begin agitating for independence, and they kill some Whites and do some other things like burn a few buildings and run some Whites out of their homes and businesses. In an effort to restore order, the U.S. military is sent in. They crack a few heads, shoo some of the Mexicans out of town, and assert their authority in declaring that the Mexicans are wrong to be agitating for a separate country.

At this point, now that word has gotten out around the world about the violence that has raged in Los Angeles and San Diego between the Mexican separatists and the U.S. military, other nations attack the U.S., saying that the U.S. forces need to be ordered out of the region by the President. Americans don't understand why the international community has such a hard time accepting the U.S. effort to restore order to a part of their own country, and why foreign nations would bomb the U.S. in protest over what appears to be an issue that is exclusively American.

Anyway, that's similar to how the Serbs viewed the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999. A simple crackdown on what the Serbs contended was a terrorist group led to an international effort to prevent Serbia from maintaining control over part of its own territory.

But that's just been par for the course for the United States in the 20th and now 21st centuries: if some country is doing something we don't like, then we stick our noses into that country's business and "fix" it for them. Unfortunately, the "fixing" always seems to be done the way the Jewish establishment wants it done, and it often results in more harm than good. One need look only as far Iraq to see that the Jewish demands that the U.S. destroy Saddam Hussein and Iraq -- for the purpose of giving Israel more breathing room in the Middle East -- have resulted only in a destabilized and more volatile Middle East, not to mention the thousands of American lives and the billions and billions of taxpayer dollars wasted.

So, what happened last week in Kosovo is just the latest chapter in the developing story in the Balkans. The Albanian-majority Kosovo asserted its complete independence from Serbia. The new state was acknowledged as legitimate by nearly two dozen nations including, most noticeably, the United States. Naturally, Serbia refused to recognize Kosovo's independent status, as did a traditional Serbia ally, Russia, and a few others, like Spain.

Predictably, the ethnic Serbs living in Kosovo were not at all happy about the move, and they have been protesting in a number of ways throughout Kosovo and the rest of Serbia to show their displeasure. Activities of Serbian unrest have included vandalizing the property of the nations considered to be the main supports for the new state, particularly property of the U.S. Compared to what the U.S. did to Serbia in 1999 or what has happened in Iraq, the unrest in Kosovo and Serbia over the past two weeks hasn't been a big deal at all -- a few fires were set and a few people injured, mainly -- but it's clear that the Serbs aren't going to go along willingly with Kosovo striking out on its own.

Now, my main point here today is not to declare the rightness or wrongness of Kosovo's declaration of independence. I'm no expert on Balkan politics, and there's a lot of history behind everything that has happened in that turbulent region over the last 100 years. There are several strongly-nationalistic ethnic groups in the area, and there have been a great number of efforts to achieve the political independence of this group or that from that ruling group or this one. I do know, for example, that the catalyst for the First World War was the assassination of Austria-Hungary's archduke Ferdinand by an ardent Serb who wanted to free his country from Austrian rule. But I'm not ready at this time to pass judgment either on the Albanians in Kosovo who declared their independence nor on the Serbs who demand that Kosovo remain a part of Serbia.

What I AM ready to pass judgment on is the response of outside nations to Kosovo's declaration of independence, and particularly on the United States' acceptance of that independence. On what grounds does the U.S. government base its decision to recognize an independent Kosovo? Is it simply because Kosovo is 90% Albanian and so therefore should be a separate nation from Serbia?

If that's the case, then the U.S. has just set a very dangerous precedent. If it recognized Kosovo, then what is to stop any ethnic majority in a particular region from declaring its independence from a larger political body? What would be the federal government's response to ethnic-majority Mexicans who declare Los Angeles and San Diego independent from the United States, as we discussed earlier in this broadcast? What if some region of Germany in which ethnic Turks are the majority declares that region as a Turkish state, independent from Germany? What if a Paki-dominated area of Britain decides to break free from British "rule"? Would the U.S. recognize those hypothetical states' claims to legitimacy, as it has recognized the legitimacy of the ethnic-Albanian region of Kosovo? These questions aren't as easy to answer as we might think, given the U.S. government's apparent immunity to reasonable thought and action.

Of course, I'm all for independent ethnic states, as I've stated many times before on these American Dissident Voices broadcasts. So, if -- in the eyes of the U.S. government -- it is okay for Kosovo to break away from Serbia on the grounds of ethnic self-determination, then why are they confining the entire White population of America to the prison of a multicultural country? What's wrong with an independent White nation-state right here in the Western Hemisphere? Why is ethnic self-determination okay in the Balkans, but nowhere else in the White world? Why MUST millions and millions of non-Whites be brought into every White nation and mixed into the fabric of the country, when it is obvious from the Balkan experience that the only thing that results is ethnic tension? If the U.S. government is going to recognize an independent Kosovo that is ethnically Albanian, then why does it demand that White people worldwide be denied an ethnic region of their own?

We need some answers to these questions, because if the U.S. is going to back ethnic self-determination as it has in Kosovo, then let's set up the negotiation tables, because we White racialists have some demands that need to be met that I'm sure the Jews and the federal government -- based on their stance on an independent Kosovo -- will be glad to grant.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.