People in a bar watch media coverage of the Virginia Tech killings.




Hello again, and welcome back to this week's broadcast of American Dissident Voices. I'm National Alliance Chairman Erich Gliebe.

It's been an eventful last couple of weeks, highlighted of course by the mass murders carried out at Virginia Tech by VTU student and Korean immigrant Cho Seung-Hui. That event is an important one and it has gotten plenty of media attention, and I'll get to it in just a minute.

But first, for those of you who follow sports, I'd like to comment briefly on April 15th, which used to be well-recognized as the day income taxes are due to be sent in to the government, but which has become known among those who pay attention to Major League Baseball as Jackie Robinson Day.

On April 15th, 1997 -- fifty years to the day that Black athlete Jackie Robinson broke the "color barrier" and played his first game on a Major League team, the Brooklyn Dodgers -- Major League Baseball retired Robinson's number, '42.' No one on any team ever again may wear that number, but several players who were wearing '42' at the time were grandfathered in and allowed to wear it for the remainder of their careers. Mariano Rivera of the New York Yankees is the only current player who still wears the sacred '42.'

This year, on April 15th -- the 60th anniversary of Robinson's debut -- many Black baseball players were allowed to wear Robinson's jersey number for their games that day, in tribute to the Hall of Famer who paved the way for them to play a game for a living and earn a salary big enough to allow them to have their pick of any number of shallow and materialistic White women. Suffice it to say that the propaganda campaign over Jackie Robinson Day was overkill on a par with the Tony Dungy/Lovie Smith "who's going to be the first Black Super Bowl winner?" circus back in January and February.

So the media is obviously into Black firsts. In this vein, I suggest that the media lead us in celebrating W. Montague Cobb Day, in honor of the first Black man to break the "color barrier" as President of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

The organization was officially founded in 1909 by a mixed-race group, including several Blacks, several Whites, and too many Jews -- including Henry Moscowitz, Julius Rosenthal, Lillian Ward, and Emil Hirsch. Ironically, the first board of directors had only one Black member, the writer and activist W.E.B. DuBois.

Not only was the NAACP founded with the help of Jewish leadership, it was funded largely by Jewish money. And, of course, the Jews therefore called the shots in the organization. The first president of the group was a White lawyer named Moorfield Story, who served from 1910 to 1915, but it didn't take long for the Jews to flex their muscles and completely take over the organization.

In 1915, the Jew Joel Springarn became president, serving for 25 years (until 1940) and recruiting other Jews -- among them Jacob Schiff, Jacob Billikopf, and Stephen Wise -- to sit on the governing board. Between 1940 and 1966, another Springarn, Arthur, acted as the next Jewish president of the NAACP. Kivie Kaplan rounded out the list of Jewish presidents when he served from 1966 to 1975.

Only then -- after being in Jewish hands for over 60 straight years, and after all of the worst hard-line civil rights battles had been fought against Old White America (and won, I might add) -- did the Jews feel comfortable enough in turning over the presidency of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People to a colored person, W. Montague Cobb.

W. Montague Cobb Day: in commemoration of the first Black man who, in 1975, broke the color barrier in the up-to-that-time almost completely Jewish-run NAACP...it's something to consider.

Moving on to other things, last week's broadcast was already complete by the time chaos erupted on the campus of Virginia Tech University, when Cho Seung-Hui killed 32 people before killing himself. As with so many people these days who are all mixed up, Seung-Hui got things completely backwards: it would have been much better for everyone if he had started out by killing himself and then tried to go after others. Unfortunately, that's not how things worked out.

Anyway, the Jewish media have spent lots of time, money, and breath on dissecting various aspects of the events that took place in Blacksburg, Virginia last week: Seung-Hui's documented history of mental instability, the ineffectiveness of the authorities in containing the threat on the VTU campus, and so on, more than I can remember and more than I am interested in. The cameras recorded hundreds of hours of footage from memorial services held in communities all over the country.

A Korean-American association in Chicago made the news when it held a candlelight vigil to commemorate the slain, and the news anchor made sure to state for the numbskulls at home that the motives and feelings of Cho Seung-Hui are not shared by the rest of the Korean-American community. That statement is generally true, of course, but it doesn't change the fact that we want them out of our living space, along with every other non-White of whatever hue. It's nothing personal; that's just the way it has to be for our race to survive and progress.

With all of the news and hype that has followed in the wake of the Virginia Tech shootings, it was hard to miss seeing a newscast in which someone from Cho Seung-Hui's past was interviewed and asked about what type of person he was. Most of the interviews I saw showed that Seung-Hui was a sullen and silent individual. His classmates said that he almost never participated in class, preferring to scowl alternately at his desk or the instructor. It was clear to everyone that Seung-Hui didn't fit into the cosmopolitan society of today, and it is equally clear that he made no attempt to fit in. He chose the life of a loner, for whatever reason, and then he let the hatred and pressure build and build until he decided to unleash it upon the students and staff at VTU.

One point that the media seized upon at several times was the suggestion made by some of Seung-Hui's former high school classmates that Seung-Hui had been ridiculed in high school in the Washington, D.C. area. We are told that other students made fun of him for any of several reasons, one being the way he talked. Whether or not it was explicitly stated on the news programs you saw, the implication being made by the media was that the events at VTU might not have occurred if Seung-Hui hadn't been ridiculed as a younger man.

I can't say how many times I've heard a newscaster make an association between someone being teased as a child and some odd behavior or outrageous act that that individual exhibits as an adult, but it's been many, many times. Those who make such associations have forgotten that everyone who engages in any social activity as a youth -- school, organized athletics, or simply playing with other kids in the neighborhood -- gets teased, without exception.

Kids with glasses are called "four eyes." Heavy kids are called "fatty." If you're too tall, you get teased. If you're too short, you get teased. If you're dumb, you get teased. If you're smart, you get teased. If your clothes aren't nice enough -- or if they are too nice -- you get teased. Bad hair day, can't dance, too slow, clumsy...you name it: there is literally no end to the number of things children (especially boys) will tease other children about. In the New York Times bestselling book Raising Cain, child psychologists Dan Kindlon and Michael Thompson call it the "culture of cruelty." With all of the teasing going on and -- according to some -- the terrible effects it has on people, it's a miracle that we ALL don't end up videotaping ourselves brandishing handguns, mailing the tape to the news media, and going on a rampage.

The obvious fact, of course, is that some people simply DEAL with teasing better than others do. What might be time well-spent for psycho-scholars out there would be to figure out exactly what it is that allows "normal" people to effectively deal with ridicule and humiliation -- and then teach these techniques to others. Instead, they try to make everyone be "nice" to each other.

It's a fine idea on paper, but like so much other idealistic pish-posh, it is doomed to failure because it overestimates the intelligence, the ability, and the motivation of human beings. Until humans evolve into higher beings -- which is what we White racialists are ultimately working toward -- we are fated to live among fellow creatures who tease and bully. But the liberal egg-heads aren't about to dump their nonsense and jump on the White Racialist bandwagon, and frankly I'm grateful for that.

You've probably seen nature shows that feature a particular breed of animal -- say, the tiger. While the cameras roll, the narrator explains how tiger cubs will wrestle with each other, competing with each other for social dominance and sometimes ganging up on a particular individual. Such behavior is common among almost all males of any breed, no matter the age. I see the teasing and bullying among humans as being along these same lines. Good or bad, teasing is just something people do.

And what a different world we'd live in if there were no ridicule. If teasing goes down, none of the late-night comedians will have anything to talk about. The Jewish media won't be able to poke fun at White Racialists anymore. And what's probably worst of all, if teasing goes down, I won't be able to ridicule George W. Bush and the barefaced lies that he peddles in his speeches, parts of which make their way onto the national news or the cable news stations on most days of the week. His big whopper in the last ten days or so was one he made in a speech in which he stated that "the tide was turning" in our favor in Iraq. Now THAT is a statement that deserves ridicule.

Anyway, as despicable as you might think teasing is, it is a fact of life that each individual must learn to deal with. Sure, it's no fun to be teased or bullied, but it's going to happen from time to time, and some people are going to get it worse and more often than are others. It's no fun to get the flu, either, but that too is going to happen from time to time, and that too afflicts some people worse and more often than it afflicts others.

The body will naturally do everything in its power to fight off the flu, and the individual usually doesn't have much choice in the matter. I suppose one could starve oneself and deliberately malnourish one's body, but individuals won't normally even consider such actions. But in the case of the teasing, one has much more freedom: the choice to resist the onslaught and become stronger, or let the experience tear down one's mind, cloud his judgment, and give him a negative rationale for counterproductive activity.

Unfortunately -- and with the tacit encouragement of the Jewish media, which is always pushing anything that tends to weaken their racial enemies -- the trend seems to be that more and more people are choosing (or being taught to choose) to let their negative experiences of the past govern their lives today. It's become fashionable to use teasing or bullying in one's past as an excuse to justify some aberrant behavior in the present, like Cho Seung-Hui's psychopathic onslaught last week at VTU.

I don't believe that having been teased as a child is any kind of excuse for aberrant behavior. If I did believe that, and if the evil one does to others as an adult is directly proportional to the amount of teasing one was subjected to as a child, then the Jewish media masters -- who use their power in a conscious effort to destroy the White race -- must have been teased more than just about anybody on the planet.

Of course, I don't really believe that the Jewish media masters were teased any more or less than the rest of us were when we were kids. They are just acting the way they do because -- unlike most Whites -- they value their race and are more than willing to use all their power and money to not only prop up their own people, but also to hack off at the knees...competing peoples, like us. But in the case of Cho Seung-Hui, teasing wasn't the issue.

The media have also made much of the failed attempt at counseling Seung-Hui. If you've been paying attention, you've heard the whimperings of, "If only we had been more persistent in trying to reach him" and "How could they just let him walk away from counseling?" For counseling to succeed, of course, the consent of the counseled is required. Based on his track record of behavior, it doesn't surprise me that Seung-Hui wasn't up for touchy-feely, psychological healing. So counseling wasn't the issue, either.

And neither was gun control the issue. The gun control freaks now have some new ammunition, if you'll pardon the pun. They'll use the VTU disaster as propaganda for their program to completely disarm America, which would, if it succeeds, put everyone completely at the mercy of a hateful media and a corrupt government that is already wrapped around the media's finger. White racialists who love freedom fight gun control on principle, but I don't see that as being the main issue in the Cho Seung-Hui case.

With Cho Seung-Hui and VTU, the main issue as I see it -- the main lesson -- is that a society with too many diverse elements is an unstable society. It's a society that no one can feel "at home" in. A society with a thousand languages (or a thousand English accents, take your pick). It's a society with a thousand unreadable faces and a thousand eyes that reflect no spark of recognition or common bond. It's an atomized society with virtually no social glue.

And that society -- or should I say anti-society -- is coming apart. Cho Seung-Hui proved that. The endless armies of jaded, TV-addicted, overweight Americans who can't cope with reality prove that. The battalions of shrinks and shysters who heal and/or make a fast buck (according to their likes) prove that.

Look around you: our society is ripping apart at the seams, and Cho Seung-Hui's rampage was only the smallest visible symptom; a painful symptom for many, no doubt, but nothing compared to the society-wide convulsions and upheaval that are in our future if we don't band together as White men and women and take our destiny back.

There IS an alternative to the collapsing society around us, but it's an alternative that requires action. Check it out, and then give us a call.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.