Jimmy Carter




Hello and welcome back to American Dissident Voices. I'm National Alliance Chairman Erich Gliebe.

If you tuned in last week, you will recall that we discussed the effect on the West of the official -- that is, the FALSE -- version of the Holocaust story. The main effect, aside from the simple extortion of money and capital resources from the West by the Jews, is that the Holocaust prevents the White race from resisting the Jewish plan for the subjugation and destruction of our people.

As I mentioned last week, in an effort to broaden popular awareness about the true nature of the Holocaust -- as well as to point out the lies in the official story -- the National Alliance has decided to hold its own International Holocaust Revisionist Conference in Hillsboro, West Virginia, over the 2007 Memorial Day Weekend.

Our preparations for the conference are already well under way, and they include speeches by prominent personalities associated with the revisionist cause, such as Lady Michele Renouf, Arthur Butz, Paul Fromm, Ingrid Rimland-Zundel -- the wife of persecuted revisionist Ernst Zundel -- and many others. We also plan to provide catered meals on both Saturday and Sunday of that weekend. The cost for attending the conference is $80 for Alliance members and $100 for guests. You can stay abreast of our latest plans for the conference at www.natvan.com and www.natallnews.com.

Thoughtfully consider attending this all-important event, because it isn't too much to say that the future of our race depends on our debunking of the Holocaust myth. We can't survive much longer with the Jews controlling the thoughts and wills of our people.

Speaking of Jews attempting to control thoughts and wills, you have undoubtedly heard about the uproar that has been tearing through the Jewish community for several weeks now over former President Jimmy Carter's latest book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. The book, which I have not yet read, chronicles the interactions between the Israelis and Palestinians from Carter's early, firsthand experiences with the conflict in the late 1970s through the present. According to most Jews -- particularly those in positions of influence in the media, in business, and in academia -- the book is biased towards the Palestinian cause. The Jews are not at all pleased about it.

In Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, Carter places blame for the situation on all parties. He blames the U.S., both for sins of omission and sins of commission. He blames Palestinians and Arabs for too often resorting to violence in an effort to get what they want. But mostly he blames Israeli government policy, which he sees as exacerbating a conflict that is tense enough already without Israel always taking a hard-line stance and tightening down the screws on the landless Palestinians.

Needless to say, Carter's conclusions have sent the Jewish community into a tizzy. The 82-year-old former President has been accused of taking a "strident and uncompromising position" and of being an "American revisionist."

The biggest and latest news came in just last week, when 14 Jews among the 200 members of the advisory board of Carter's nonprofit organization, The Carter Center, resigned their posts in protest. These resignations follow the earlier resignation of Jew Kenneth Stein, a longtime Carter advisor and Fellow at the Carter Center.

The Jews wasted no time in piling on the condemnation on top of the resignations. In Los Angeles, the dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Rabbi Martin Hier, stated that Carter has only himself to blame for the resignations due to the book being "blatantly one-sided and unbecoming of a former President." And to REALLY stick it to Carter, the Central Conference of American Rabbis has vowed NOT to visit the Carter Center in March when the organization holds its convention in Atlanta.

Actually, with fewer Jews advising and fewer Jews visiting the Carter Center, perhaps the working staff members at the Center are grateful that -- finally -- the 39th President has written a book saying something that ticked off the Jews enough to make them voluntarily stay away from the Carter Center.

This book has been a long time in coming. Since leaving office in 1981, former President Carter has written more than 20 books on various subjects, but this is his first in-depth attempt to bring the events of Palestine and the policies of the interested parties into view for the American public. To listen to the mainstream Jewish media lately, you'd think that Carter was a closet racist. A brief look at his track record shows that his behavior through the years completely contradicts that assertion.

After graduating from the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis in the top 10% of his class, Jimmy Carter served a few years in the Navy before returning home to Georgia upon his father's death to manage the family peanut-farming business. He served as a Georgia State Senator from 1963 to 1967 and was eventually elected Governor of Georgia in 1971.

Most of Carter's activities both before and after entering politics didn't (and still don't) endear him to White racialists. Carter never joined the Citizens' Council, a segregationist group that enjoyed wide popularity and intellectual prestige in the South of the '60s and '70s. He was also among the few members of his congregation in Plains, Georgia to vote in favor of admitting Blacks into the church.

In considering all of the evidence about Carter's public life, it seems to me that Carter's activities on behalf of Blacks were NOT to curry the favor of the Jewish media, but rather were the result of a naive ignorance of the historical foundations of race and racial integrity. In other words, I believe he was doing what he really thought was the right thing to do, as based on his Christian ethics, which he admits have been the driving force in his life. I disagree with him and believe that his values are misplaced, but it seems to me that Carter was and is a sincere human being.

Be that as it may, Carter's integrationist leanings became even more obvious after he entered politics. As Governor of Georgia, Carter was the first upper-level Southern politician to declare that the era of segregation was over, and he subsequently appointed record numbers of Blacks to positions in the Georgia state government. He made many reforms in state government, many of them directed at helping Georgia's lower-income citizens -- most of them Black -- in the areas of housing and education.

When the Democratic Party was looking for someone to challenge Republican Gerald Ford in the 1976 Presidential election, Carter was initially a dark-horse candidate. He had worked with the Democratic National Committee, but still wasn't one of the first Democrats to come to mind as a Presidential candidate. But then something strange happened. Lawrence Shoup notes in his 1980 book The Carter Presidency And Beyond:

"What Carter had that his opponents did not was the acceptance and support of elite sectors of the mass communications media. It was their favorable coverage of Carter and his campaign that gave him an edge, propelling him rocket-like to the top of the opinion polls. This helped Carter win key primary election victories, enabling him to rise from an obscure public figure to President-elect in the short space of 9 months."

I infer from Shoup's words that the media Jews thought they had found what they wanted in Carter: a man who really believed that racial integration was the right thing to do and who was not afraid to stand behind those beliefs with concrete actions. After all, to do what Carter did in Georgia -- battling segregation, appointing Blacks, and so on -- required not only conviction but also bravery. The Jews like such a man, and their favorable media attention put Jimmy Carter in the White House in January of 1977.

If the Jewish media and their cohorts in the government were pleased about Carter's election, they were even more pleased when they saw some of the actions he took while President. Just like in Georgia, Carter promoted the interests of Blacks and other minorities -- particularly Hispanics -- and appointed unheard-of numbers of non-Whites to federal posts. Carter also promoted the first plan to give full citizenship to the millions of illegal Mexican immigrants, a proposal that the late Dr. William Pierce strongly criticized in a speech at the time, entitled "Has the White Race Become Too Liberal to Survive?" That outstanding speech, by the way, is still available in CD and cassette format from National Vanguard Books at NatvanBooks.com.

President Carter was (and still is) a strong believer in human rights, and he based his foreign policy on those ideals. For example, he took heat from the public for the Panama Canal Treaties of 1977, which effectively turned U.S. control of the strategic Panama Canal over to the sovereign -- but weak and unstable -- nation of Panama. He continued the economic sanctions against Rhodesia -- now Zimbabwe -- justifying his decision by saying that the human rights of the Rhodesian Blacks were being violated under the existing White government. He boycotted the 1980 Summer Olympic Games in Moscow in protest of the Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan. He also made diplomatic strides with China in an effort to influence the atrocious human rights record of that nation. He hammered out the nuclear weapons reduction agreement -- the Strategic Arms Limitations Talks, or SALT II Treaty -- with the Soviet Union, even though the agreement was never formally ratified by the legislature.

At least in Carter's mind, all of these policy moves were justified according to his ideal of promoting human rights worldwide. My rebuttal to that notion is that it is IMPOSSIBLE to treat everyone -- or even every group -- equally. It is IMPOSSIBLE to equally consider everyone's so-called "human rights." Therefore, in the event of a conflict between the well-being of the White race and that of an alien people, the interests and security of our people must be addressed first. Jimmy Carter doesn't see things that way, but that is the stance White people must learn to embrace if we are to earn our racial freedom.

Anyway, after visiting the turbulent Middle East in 1977, President Carter invited Middle Eastern leaders to meet with him at Camp David, in Maryland, in hopes of drawing up a peace agreement to bring calm to the region. The results of that meeting were the Camp David Accords of 1978. Among other things, the Accords called for peace between Israel and Egypt, and that agreement between those two nations still stands today. So Carter has some experience in the Middle East, gaining firsthand knowledge in the very first year of his Presidency.

So, in terms of racial integration, Carter was just what the Jews were looking for, but in terms of the rest of it -- in the eyes of the Jews, anyway -- Carter was neither good nor bad, he was just... there. But the ills of "stagflation" -- that is, a stagnant economy and inflation, at the same time -- and the Iran hostage crisis with its bungled rescue attempt in April of 1980 were too much for Americans to handle. Republican Ronald Reagan swamped him in the 1980 election, and Jimmy Carter left the White House in 1981 to continue his humanitarian mission elsewhere.

In 1982, Carter founded the Carter Center in Atlanta, with the purpose of promoting human rights, democracy, health, and peace around the globe. He also continues to be involved in Habitat for Humanity, and he has traveled regularly around the world to promote peace among warring nations. Jimmy Carter was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002, for his -- and I quote -- "efforts to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, conduct peace negotiations, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development."

So Jimmy Carter was (and is) by no means a favorite of White racialists and, up until now, the Jews have never complained about him. And that's because, up until now, Carter has never crossed the Jews; he either did things they liked or he did things about which they were indifferent. It's true they let him off easy some months ago during Israel's war with Hezbollah when, in an interview with the German magazine Der Spiegel, Carter stated: "I don't think Israel has any legal or moral justification for their massive bombing of the entire nation of Lebanon." Like in a game of Bingo, the Jews were fine with letting Carter put one chip on the free space, but with Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, he's now trying to put MORE chips on the board, and they are dead set against that.

With his latest book, Carter shows us that he not only noticed something that he wasn't supposed to notice, but also that he has enough courage to speak publicly about it. The things he wasn't supposed to notice or talk about are (1) the unbending and vicious stance taken by Israel in its dealings with the Palestinians, and (2) the Jewish managing of public opinion here in the U.S. As much as Jimmy Carter is not a White racialist, it turns out that he is right about both of these two things.

And that's why the Jews are spattering with slime the old man they once supported. But Carter, at least to date, isn't backing down. Quite to the contrary. He has already made several attempts to further clarify his position, and more attempts are in the works.

In an opinion piece that was printed in the December 8 edition of the Los Angeles Times Carter wrote indirectly about the Jewish stranglehold on our opinions regarding the Middle East: "In the last 30 years, I have witnessed and experienced the severe restraints on any free and balanced discussion of the facts." Steve Berman, one of the Jews who just resigned from the Carter Center's advisory board, said that the Jewish board members "watched with great dismay" as the former Chief Executive defended his position, rather than rolling over as have most of those who have crossed the Jews. Berman and the other Jewish board members were particularly distressed that Carter implied that the powerful forces of organized Jewry in the U.S. make Americans fearful to openly discuss the Palestinian question.

And rather than apologize and beg for them to return, Carter diplomatically bid farewell to the resigning board members, thanking the Jewish quitters for their service. The old man got in another minor dig when the Center's statement added that the organization's governing board was unaffected by the 14 resignations of advisory board members.

Carter's mini-crusade continues. In an interview with Wolf Blitzer, Carter mentioned the "minority of Israelis who refuse to swap land for peace." He has also agreed to speak in Waltham, Massachusetts at Brandeis University -- a college with a Jewish tradition and a large Jewish student population -- and has offered to field questions. Who would have thought that a liberal Democrat, once the darling of integrationists and destructive-minded Jews alike, would be opening eyes about the true situation in Palestine and about Jewish power in America?

Furthermore, it is instructive to compare the "official" and popular stances on Carter's new book. Perhaps the easiest way to see this discrepancy is to go to amazon.com and read the reviews of Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. One of the "official" reviews, done by Jew Jeffrey Goldberg of the Washington Post Book World, is a good example of the loathing Jews have for anyone who -- even without meaning to -- tries to spill their pot of beans. Most of the popular reviews, on the other hand -- the ones done by mainstream readers of the book -- are very complimentary. It is an interesting dichotomy, and I encourage you to check it out.

You know, after detesting Jimmy Carter's anti-White racial policies and scoffing at his ultimately fruitless attempts to achieve health, democracy, and human rights worldwide, I find myself in the odd position of cheering on the old coot as he spars with the Jews about Palestine and about Jewish power in America. You should do the same, because as soon as we can achieve critical mass with the Jewish Question -- the Holocaust, Palestine, Jewish control in America -- we will be able to turn our racialist ideals into something concrete. And after all, that's the point of our entire racialist struggle.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.