Most Whites don't want any species of animal to become extinct, so why are they blasé about Whites becoming extinct?

Thanks for tuning in again to American Dissident Voices. I'm your host, Erich Gliebe.

The racialist struggle that we in the National Alliance are leading is a very important one, and that's because the outcome of that struggle will determine whether the unique combination of genes that we call the White race will continue to exist or not. Most people are opposed to any of the various animal species becoming extinct, but unfortunately there are hundreds of millions of White people worldwide who haven't yet made the preservation of their kind a priority. This program is one of the tools that we in the National Alliance are employing in our efforts to raise the consciousness of our kinfolk.

Now, in contrast to all of the Whites who presently are inactive in the patriotic struggle to secure a homeland for our people, there are many others who have joined the National Alliance or another patriotic organization elsewhere in the world and who are doing everything they can to achieve our collective racialist goals.

Most members of the National Alliance or other legitimate White racialist organizations are NOT dyed-in-the-wool racists. Most of them weren't raised in homes where racism or racial stereotyping was the order of the day. In fact, surprising numbers of them were raised in homes grounded in the multiracial ideals of the counterculture of the 1960s and 1970s. Only when they left home and began to see the folly of those ideals and their racially-destructive consequences did they look elsewhere for a worldview that accurately assessed the racial situation and offered a program to remedy the debilities of the current system. The National Alliance offers that accurate worldview and that program of racial renewal.

So most members of the National Alliance were once the ordinary people that you interact with many times a day. Most of them started out just like you did: believing in the essential goodness of the American system of government. Basically, most of us had a more-or-less complete trust in the government and in its managing of our country for our fundamental good.

After all, if it weren't good for our country, why would our government allow our heavy industry to be exported overseas? Why would our government allow millions and millions of non-White immigrants to enter our country? Why would our government, which is supposed to be concerned about the long-term welfare of our country, look away and even encourage an environmental policy that will result in the rapid changing of all of the planet's ecosystems if left unchecked? After all, the government has the power to address, if not solve, these problems and many others. So why doesn't it?

The easiest and most convenient answer to all of these questions is the one that most Whites -- in whom trust is an inborn trait -- want to give: "The government is watching out for us, so we just need to trust that it's doing the right thing. Even if we go through some setbacks, those are only temporary situations and the government wouldn't let them happen if they weren't for our long-term good." That easy, convenient, and -- I might add -- INCORRECT answer keeps most people safely huddled together in the mainstream and well out-of-range of those of us in the White racialist Cause who are trying to get across a quite different message.

It is a painful experience when a person begins to lose that trust and finally decides to look at the available information about what the government is doing and why. It's even more painful when, based on the data, the sickening answers become apparent. Basically, what it comes down to is that the government is NOT looking out for the best interests of our people and it is NOT doing everything in its power to fix the problems afflicting our nation and race.

But the most painful experience for a White person comes after he realizes that the government has given up trying to secure for him and his people any sort of viable future. That pain is the one involved in the crossing of the gulf between recognizing that things aren't going the way they should be and choosing to make an effort to straighten things out. On the one side of the gulf is what George Orwell called thoughtcrime, and on the other side is the acceptance of, and commitment to, an opposing worldview. The pain in crossing that gulf is so great that millions of White Americans stay on the thoughtcrime side of the gulf, managing the day-to-day affairs of their own lives as best they can, without even making an effort to cross to the other side.

But those who DO cross to the other side of the gulf -- the side on which one wholeheartedly throws his support to a better philosophy and a better way of life -- these are the ones who could no longer deny that the White racialist worldview of the National Alliance is fundamentally correct in its assessment of history and in the current situation. Despite every external incentive NOT to become involved in the program and activities of an organization that receives nothing but criticism from a media controlled by its opponents, these brave White men and women have chosen to run against the grain.

And the reason they have done so in the past, the reason they are doing so right now, and the reason they will do so more and more over the next five to ten years... is that, on the essentials of every fundamental issue of importance to the maintenance and progress of a civilized society, we have been right.

It's as simple as that. There's no getting around it, and any critic of our worldview and its program to create a future for our people MUST take that into account. Similarly, any White person of good will, in deciding his course of action in life -- whether to go along with the values of the present society or to back the National Alliance's values of racial self-determination -- must also take that into account. Where the worldviews of our many opponents have failed time and time again, our worldview has consistently been upheld by the events around us. Where our opponents have predicted untold benefits if White nations acted in accord with THEIR values, the White people in those White nations were treated to lies and disappointment. But, in each case, our White racialist worldview correctly predicted the consequences of the actions taken.

For example, we were right about the non-White immigration issue. Going back to the first half of the 20th Century and even before, observers and thinkers like the American Lothrop Stoddard predicted dire consequences for America if non-White immigration remained unchecked. Other racialist thinkers, like the French author of the novel The Camp of the Saints, Jean Raspail, foresaw similar disturbing events. When the late Dr. William Pierce founded the National Alliance in the early 1970s, he picked up the battle standard hoisted by many other objective Whites over the years and set down the organization's opposition to non-White immigration and the rationale behind that opposition.

So the Alliance's opposition to non-White immigration has been around more than 30 years -- since the organization's inception -- and it hasn't changed one iota in that time. Finally, and at long last, non-White immigration has become such a massive problem that not even ordinary Americans can avoid it. And that includes the millions of White Americans who have been aware of our country's problems but who opted NOT to join a patriotic group in hopes that they wouldn't ever have to look such problems in the face.

Illegal immigration is now such a hot topic that maverick newscasters such as CNN's Lou Dobbs can talk about and criticize the government's handling of the issue... and NOT get fired. I've watched Dobbs numerous times, and each time I am amazed that he's still on the air. I must conclude that Dobbs has such a big following throughout the United States that CNN doesn't want to risk a public backlash by firing him. Certainly, the Jews in the media and government can't be too thrilled about the information Dobbs presents, even though -- understandably -- he doesn't take a strictly racialist viewpoint. But the essentials of the immigration issue come right out of Dobbs' mouth, right there on TV, and any adult of even average intelligence can make the connection between race and immigration. But my point is that the Alliance has been disseminating the truth about non-White immigration for decades -- long before Lou Dobbs -- and we'll continue to do so.

We were also right about Islamic extremists targeting the U.S. for its lopsided support of Israel in that country's regional wars against everybody else in the region -- namely, the Arabic Muslims. Long ago, the late Dr. William Pierce had predicted a violent backlash on U.S. soil by Muslim fanatics who would be fed up with U.S. policy in the Middle East. He went so far as to write an article on the subject in the National Alliance publication National Vanguard, and he suggested that it would be wise for his readers to stay out of tall buildings.

Dr. Pierce's predictions came true in 1993, when fundamentalist Muslims detonated a car bomb in the underground parking garage of one of the World Trade Center towers, killing six and injuring more than a thousand others. That attack was relatively minor, but it paved the way for the tragedy of September 11th, 2001. Those attacks and many others, including the suicide attack on the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon in 1983 -- which killed 241 Marines -- as well as the attack on the U.S.S. Cole in 2000, could have been avoided if only the U.S. were even marginally fair-handed in its stance in the Middle East. Instead, the National Alliance's correct appraisal that the U.S. government is squarely under the thumb of the Jewish establishment is evident for all to see.

As another example, we were opposed from Day One to the whole business in Iraq. When Bush, the Jewish Media, and Company (such as Perle and Wolfowitz) first began presenting shoddy evidence that allegedly linked Saddam with the 9/11 attacks, we spoke up immediately, pointing out the holes in the so-called "evidence." We followed up that statement with the facts about the Jewish stranglehold on our media and our government, and we also stated that THOSE power elements DID have a good reason to go after Hussein -- because he was a supporter of the Palestinians and was a half-baked military threat to Israel.

When more sewage hit the propaganda airwaves -- sewage about Weapons of Mass Destruction, for instance -- we piped up, saying that Washington hadn't presented any hard evidence to back their claim. But the anti-Saddam crusade launched by the media had built up a head of steam by that time, and our objections weren't enough to save the U.S. troops and all of Iraq from the bloodbath that inevitably followed. When, many months later, all of our opponents "truths" were revealed as lies -- Saddam was NOT in any way connected with 9/11, he did NOT have any stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and he did NOT secure any uranium from Africa for use in nuclear weapons -- it was little consolation for us to be able to say, "We told you so."

So the long and short of it is that we -- the National Alliance -- have been right nearly all of the time. I won't say that we are always 100% right about what happens in our world, but when we HAVE been wrong, it has been on minor details. On the main issues -- the damage of all kinds caused by non-White immigration, the control of the news and entertainment media by Jews who use that control to promote their own agenda at the expense of our people, and the deterioration of every facet of our society as racial diversity becomes more and more pronounced -- on those issues and many smaller but related ones, we are right on target. And as I mentioned above, any attempt to argue away the ideals of the National Alliance and the White Racialist Cause must account for our remarkable track record, a record that no other worldview can match.

Many of the issues that divide Americans get talked about, in one way or another. Whether it is Lou Dobbs talking about non-White immigration on CNN, two White neighbors talking about the Mexicans who scour the neighborhood the night before garbage pickup looking to get some more use out of other people's junk, or two White teachers talking about the glut of non-English speaking newcomers to the school district, non-White immigration gets talked about. The war in Iraq is in the national news every day, and every American knows someone who has served or is currently serving in Iraq, so that issue gets talked about, too -- not in a racial context usually, but at least it's on people's minds.

But there is one idea that we in the National Alliance promote that doesn't get talked about much, and we believe that if it did, our race would get a boost that might just lift us up-and-out of this muck and mire in which we find ourselves.

That idea is that the men and women of the National Alliance believe in racial separation, and that what we want most is our own homeland, where we can be free to live by the spark -- unique to our people -- that Nature first put there tens of thousands of years ago. We don't want to "take over the government" or any other such nonsense; for all we care, the present system can continue on its merry way when we have secured our own turf.

But we aren't about to bend on that count. We MUST have our own land, and that means that we can't simply forget about the existing system, because we are going to have to deal with that system in somehow acquiring our homeland.

Somehow, we'll get the job done. Somehow, the worldview of the National Alliance will prevail. And when I say it will prevail, I'm talking NOT about conquering the whole world; I'm talking about our philosophy prevailing in various regions of the Earth -- regions where White societies will exist under White values.

And the reason we will prevail is because we tell the truth. Unlike our opponents, who use words as tools, according to the circumstances -- as tools of power, as tools of subterfuge, or as tools of intimidation -- we use words to describe reality. We say it like it is, and if we ever make a mistake, we are manly enough to stand up and admit it, unlike George W. Bush.

But we don't make mistakes often, and NEVER on the major issues, only occasionally on the minor and essentially insignificant nuances of those issues. That's why the ideology of the National Alliance hasn't changed at all since the Alliance's inception more than three decades ago. There's been no need to change our basic ideas. And that's because they are right.

Western science, the ideas behind which are the exclusive domain and pride of the White race, is all about observing reality and then coming up with theories to explain those observations. A good theory is one that not only explains the existing observations but also can be used to predict future events. That's what scientists do to test their theories: they use their new theory to predict what SHOULD happen if they change THIS variable, and then they go ahead and change that variable in the lab to see if the theory holds. If it does, they test the theory again in a different way. If the theory fails, it's no good; they modify the theory or throw it out altogether.

The success we've had in predicting the general trend of events in our world suggests that we in the National Alliance have a pretty darn good theory behind us. Now, there are too many variables in our society to expect our theory to be perfect in every instance, but I will say this: it is the best theory out there, and it's never been wrong on any fundamental issue.

And the most fundamental issue that concerns you and your children is that racial separation is natural and healthy. That separation was necessary for Nature to create the various races that exist today, and it is necessary for the races to continue to evolve down their respective paths in the future. Our present society is an anomaly of history in that so many different people of so many different races are trying to exist side-by-side in the same geographical region. History has shown that that state of affairs cannot be maintained. And the fact that we in the National Alliance believe this, coupled with the fact that we have been right in so many other spheres, suggests that you should sit up and pay attention to the idea of racial separation.

We in the National Alliance are trying to fix our situation before it's too late. We WILL win because we tell the truth, and you need to put aside your fear and join us.

I'm Erich Gliebe, Chairman of the National Alliance, and thanks for being with me again today.