Hello, and welcome to American Dissident Voices, America's premier radio and Internet broadcast for White people sponsored by the National Alliance and reaching White people all over the world. I am your host, Shaun Walker.

We at the National Alliance are famous for being supporters for the White race. Our enemies do all they can to describe us as being "against" other races, but this isn't the case. We are actually 100% pro-White, and we seek living space for White people, free from influences outside of our race and politically independent.

In fact, this demand is so reasonable and so in line with even the Founding Charter of the otherwise degenerate United Nations. Listeners will be interested to know that this Charter guarantees self-determination for all the people of the world, that we could even make a case for our ideological position in that body. Not that we would want to, mind you, given that the UN resembles more and more, every day, the gorilla enclosure at Oakland Zoo, but that's another issue.

The point is that all we actually seek is White self-determination in our own territory, like every other race. How much more reasonable can that be?

No one questions the self-determination Indians have on their reservations.

No one questions the right to self-determination for the Eskimos (Inuit) in the far North of Canada. Hell no. The Canadian government has even passed laws to grant the Eskimos control over a vast expanse of territory which the non-Whites claimed.

This model exists throughout the world: everywhere you go, you will find assorted non-White races and groups all successfully claiming their right to self determination, all with the support of the liberals and even other non-Whites.

The Palestinians are a case in point. Most politically-prominent Negroes in America support the Palestinians having a separate state, and object to the Palestinians being ruled by the Zionist Jewish state. And rightly so. In this demand, they are joined by the White extreme left-wing of the political spectrum.

Yet, you will not find one of these White extremist left-wingers supporting the concept of a territory for White people in which they can have self-determination. Liberal hypocrisy is as boundless as time.

If we, or anyone else who supports White self-determination, raises the issue of White separatism with any of these non-White groups, or the left-wingers of any race, we are dismissed as "White supremacists" or "haters" or what-ever word they like to use at that moment in time.

But honestly, we don't care much about what they call us. We know what we need, and we work day and night to achieve it. Why should we be ashamed of being White? On the contrary, we are proud of our race, the race that has produced every single great scientific innovation on the planet. Our race has produced all the greatest works of art, and it is our aesthetic norms that dominate the entire world.

We do not seek to physically dominate the world. We believe that other races must remain geographically separated from us.

But the one question that the Liberals ask us is "why?" Why do we want White self-determination and our own territory?

Now for regular listeners to this program this may seem like a non sequitur, which literally means "it does not follow." If other races have the right to not be ruled by Whites, then Whites have the right to not be ruled by other races.

But to the racially confused minds in the Right and Left wings, and the non-White minds, this way of thinking makes no impact: they will dismiss our demands for White self-determination as the very worst plan possible, especially when we present our reasons for wanting such a solution.

And our reasons are that we feel that non-White influences are destructive to our race, our civilization, and our future. Our reasons are both short and long-term.

Over the long-term, we point out that the historical record shows very clearly that all great civilizations in the past which have fallen, have done so because of racial-mixing which came about because the different races were sharing the same geographical area.

Over the short-term, our demand for White self-determination centers around three combined issues: IQ levels, behavior and social standards.

Now, IQ levels are an interesting topic. Test upon test show without exception that races differ vastly in IQ. The average Negro in America scores consistently around 15 to 20 points lower than the average White American. This has been the case since racially based IQ studies were first undertaken, and has lasted right through to this very day, despite the liberals' best efforts to change the environment in which American Negroes live.

The American Negro scores between 80 and 85 on average, compared to the average White IQ of 102. The really disturbing part of this statistic is something which few people consider: namely that these are the averages. What this actually means is that half of all American Negroes actually have IQs lower than 80.

Now, consider further what this means: in the White world, an individual who has an IQ lower than 80, is officially considered retarded, and is most often placed in an institution of some sort, but not, however, with Negroes, though. They are left to vote and rampage through White society, as they so amply demonstrated in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.

Actually, when one considers the broader implications, the situation is even more frightening. Most American Negroes are in fact racially-mixed. They, for the most part, have a bit of White-blood in them, which boosts their IQ levels slightly.

One can see this in Africa too, where IQ tests have been carried out: the average genuinely Black sub-Saharan Negro IQ average is closer to 72. But the mixed-Black in South Africa, called the Cape Coloureds, score virtually identical with the Blacks in America. I can recommend a small book which deals with that topic, by Professor Phillipe Rushton, called Race, Evolution and Behavior, which details his failed attempts to prove these statistics wrong. He was eventually forced to concede that it was completely accurate. You can get a copy of this great little book from National Vanguard Books, online at www.natvanbooks.com, for just $8.95 postpaid. It's well worth it.

Now, liberals hate when we even mention these rock-solid scientific facts, except, of course, when they show that other groups might have a higher average IQ than Whites: then we are told about it constantly in the media. This is actually selective Political Correctness in action.

For example, it is also an established fact that certain groups of Mongoloids, most notably some -- but, importantly, not all -- groups of Japanese, Chinese and Koreans have IQ averages one or two points above that for Whites.

Now personally, I don't feel threatened or angry by that fact and no proper-thinking White person should either because IQ is, perhaps surprisingly to some listeners, not the sole determinant to civilization levels, although it is of course overall quite important.

The reason for me saying this is simple: you need more than a high IQ to create a civilization and to maintain it. To do that, you need social cohesiveness, or what the French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau called the Social Contract.

To maintain a Social Contract -- which is an unspoken agreement to live in harmony with other members of your chosen society -- you need a degree of emotional and psychological maturity. This is what makes you and I not rob our neighbor's house when we see that the door has been left open, or the same thing which impels us to live in clean and orderly societies. It makes us feel good to see our White neighbors cutting their grass, or replacing their roof.

And right here, objective observers will automatically understand that this psychological maturity issue is what is most lacking amongst Negroes. No matter what their IQ is, they lack the fundamental psychological make-up to form a coherent and sustainable Social Contract. This is the primary reason for their lawlessness and worldwide recognized ability to trash almost any neighborhood. Even their intelligent leaders lack this.

If you take the top 10,000 intelligent Negro leaders in South Africa, their IQ scores will equal or surpass the average IQ score for Whites overall. But, you put those Whites in charge and they can make the country run smoothly. If you remove those Whites and put the intelligent Negroes in charge, it will unravel in short order.

You see, there are actually enough Negroes with sufficiently high IQs to, in theory, sustain, if not create, a civilization of reasonable standards. Consider for a moment that if the average White American IQ is 102, this means that half of all White Americans have an IQ level below average - yet they are still, as a general rule - able to sustain their place in society and not turn every single suburb or city they inhabit into a ruined ghetto like modern-day Detroit.

Yet, Negroes, who have equivalent IQs or just below the White average, are still not capable of sustaining any sort of ordered society -- because they lack the vital ingredient: social responsibility.

Now, the Mongoloid groups to which I referred earlier, the Northern Mongoloid stock, the ones who display IQ levels slightly above the average White IQ level, also display this social responsibility factor, but in ways very different then ours. Anyone who has been to Japan will recognize this instantly.

At the time of the Kobe earthquake in 1995, when many of Japan's huge electronics factories had been literally smashed down, and electronic equipment of all sorts was laying around in boxes ready for the taking, there was only one reported incident of looting throughout the entire city of 8 million people.

And when the looters were arrested, it turned out they were Afghans. Not one single Japanese person picked up even a single item during that enormous disaster. Incredible - and it shows the high level of their social cohesiveness, which stands in marked contrast to the Negroes of New Orleans, needless to say.

Now I don't want to mix, racially speaking, with the Japanese, and I don't want Kobe's population moving in next door, but I can admire and respect them for who they are, where they are.

And I don't care if their average IQ is one or two points higher than ours: that's fine; it doesn't bother or affect me in the slightest.

Now, I dare say, that if a Kobe-type tragedy had to strike what is left of the American industrial base - although such a disaster is less and less likely as the raceless-capitalists keep on stripping our industries and exporting them to China - then there would most likely be a few -- a very few -- Whites who would possibly loot or take something for themselves in the midst of that chaos.

But here is the critical point: the numbers of Whites who would do such a thing are a minority, and they are frowned upon by the rest of White society. With the Negroes, the inverse happens: a majority takes part in the lawlessness, and the perpetrators become folk heroes, the Tookie Williams or the Gangster Rappers of the Negro world, the role models who are admired and emulated.

IQ is therefore a basic building block for civilization and progress, but it is by no means the single element required. This brings me to the issue of the so-called "White Trash."

A lot of what the media call "White trash" are of course just perfectly ordinary Whites who are not Politically Correct, live in the countryside and don't appear to endorse diversity. Some even prefer to home-school their children rather than send them to the jungles which have become our public schools. With that said, it is fair to say that there really are a number of Whites who really are White Trash in the proper sense of the word.

The really interesting thing about White degenerates is that their behavior, unsurprisingly, of course, comes from a genetic origin as well.

How many times have you seen or heard of persistent White criminals who have a family history of criminality? The old saying rings true: the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

I know a former policeman who assured me that on far more than one occasion that he wished to recall, he found grandfather, father and son, all locked up together for some crime. It was literally a family of criminals. And very often, you can even see it in their faces: Nature packages truth in advertising.

You know, the first time the Nazi government of Germany used the word "Untermensch, or "underman," they were not referring to Jews or non-Whites at all: they were referring to White, German criminal-types, and they spoke of the need to eugenically remove that biological element out from the healthy German society.

And so it is with us today: while we accept and understand the importance of differences between the races, we also accept and understand differences within our own race.

The healthy society to which we strive will seek to eugenically remove the lower elements from our White society, while encouraging the higher elements to reproduce in abundance.

This is exactly the opposite of the existing social democracy in America, which taxes the higher elements of White society to subsidize the indiscriminate breeding of the lowest stock of society.

This goal is not difficult to achieve: in fact, it is surprisingly easy. But we need a government that puts race first, above all else, to achieve this.

In this way, a racially-conscious government would, immediately, halt all foreign aid to non-White countries and especially Israel. That would slice billions off our budget - billions that could be returned to society in the form of either tax relief for the middle classes, or direct subsidies for those middle classes to reproduce.

Adolf Hitler invented a very interesting social model. He used the carrot-and-stick approach, because one without the other will not work.

His "carrot" policy was to grant each newly-married German couple a state loan of 20,000 Reichmarks, which in those days, was more than enough for that family to buy a house, furniture and kick start their lives. The loan was repayable - either in money over a period of time - or best of all by children. For each child born, 5,000 Reichmarks was deducted from the bill. Four children later, the fertile couple was debt free. What could be more natural and healthy?

At the same time, Hitler's 'stick' policy consisted of identifying the degenerate elements within society - the habitual criminals and the like, all of whom were people who had repeatedly and blatantly broken the Social Contract -- and, after certification by an independent medically-appointed genetic court, they were sterilized. That was the end of that genetic line, and over the generations, that burden on society was simply removed by natural aggregation: the better quality Germans reproduced more than the lower quality Germans. Germany to this day has one of the lowest delinquency rates in all of Europe as a result. This act of truncating out the worst genetic element of society is the most scientifically advanced way to improve society. But, the Jews are currently calling the shots and they fear a better stock of White people. The Jews want to mix the Whites with all the non-Whites and lower the genetic quality even further.

But aside from the current ruling power that opposes eugenics, there is nothing else that comes even close to addressing this real, biological problem in society. Think about it. What could be simpler, more humane and more beneficial for our society?

This then, provides an answer to one of the most commonly heard counter-arguments to our point of view: namely the existence of genuine "White Trash."

For every Negro criminal, a liberal can hold up a White criminal; for every Jew Communist, there is a White liberal, and so on.

And yes, let us admit freely and honestly that there are elements within White societies that are degenerate, depraved and socially harmful: but then let us also be unequivocally honest in saying that we don't want to live with them either. This is the best way and it will greatly improve White society.

White nationalists often get discouraged with other White people in the way they behave, in what they do, and, most commonly, in the political choices they seem to make. Who in their right mind would have full-heartedly voted for George W. Bush or for John Kerry? I personally don't have any idea.

But millions did, and those White nationalists who look at this fact closely, can quickly become discouraged and come to the conclusion that White separatist activity is pointless. But they are forgetting an important message given to us by our founder, Dr. William Pierce.

He told us, in no uncertain terms, that when we work for our new society, we should not be discouraged by what we see around us.

We work, Dr. Pierce said, not for what it is now - otherwise we would be conservatives - but rather we work for what can be.

Dr. Pierce used the analogy of a garden, overrun with weeds. A gardener, who sees only weeds, might give up without even trying. A visionary, who sees the blades of grass and roses lying half submerged in the weeds, and who conceptualizes a grand garden, free of weeds and sprouting new life, the re-growth of Nature's glory, is the true carrier of our racial renewal and the rebirth of our Aryan Folk.

No, we are not conservatives who seek to preserve the existing order. To hell with the existing order - it is corrupt, decadent, and must fall. We don't want to preserve the obviously failed, existing social construct; we wish to see a new society, in which merit and merit alone determines political leadership, not with how the current establishment promotes the best liars to the top.

We do not seek to maintain the existing raceless order, or to go back to the days of segregation. We know and understand fully that segregation, as well-intentioned as it might have been, was a recipe for disaster.

We don't seek to rule over anybody but ourselves, and we need racial separation in our own areas, and not segregation within a joint area. That is the only solution.

No sir, conservatives we are not. We are revolutionaries in the true sense of the word: we seek to remodel the world in a new image, to cast down the lies and racial treason of the old order, and to return to the eternal laws of race as our guiding light.

Only with the full understanding of race, acceptance of racial differences and geographic separation, can we avoid racial conflict.

Yes, you heard me correctly: we seek a world without racial conflict, where each race is free to achieve whatever it may, within its own space, without interference from outside.

This goal is really this ironic, to the extreme that the solution to the racial problem which we seek, is in fact the only manner in which the racial harmony which the liberals so desperately desire, can be achieved.

We know and understand this eternal truth. Birds of a feather flock together, as should you and I.

We have our goal clearly laid out in front of us. We are resolute in our intention to see the flowering garden of our glorious race instead of the Jew-ridden, race-mixed weed patch, and we work unceasingly for our goal.

Why don't you join with us today? Join the National Alliance and become a part of our racial rebirth.