Firearms have been freely owned by Americans since the earliest times. Pictured here are the Pilgrims with their muskets.


Hello and welcome to America Dissident Voices, I'm Shaun Walker.

Firearms are a part of the American culture, even more so than baseball, apple-pie, or Chevrolet. Firearms were a part of every White nation's culture ever since they replaced the sword and bow-and-arrow. When America was founded, we were an extension of Europe, and privately owned firearms made it possible for us to win the 400-year race war against the Asiatic inhabitants of North America.

At that time, at the start of the 16th Century, there were many restrictions on personal freedom in various European nations. These restrictions were always enacted with the purpose of controlling the population, so as to prevent the masses from overthrowing the ruling elite. This was long before the Jews had taken over control of the media and, in fact, before the mass media existed.

Everyone back then knew that restrictions on weapons, be they swords or firearms, came about because the ruling elite feared the population over whom they governed. The phrase, "Fear a government that fears an armed population," has been reworded and used throughout the ages. A government that does not fear its population has no reason to seek to control firearms.

Today, very little has changed, except the Jew ownership of our media is to such a degree that the Jews can influence most aspects of life in our country. Since the Jews do not want the alien people over whom they rule to be armed, they have taken it upon themselves to use their powerful media to distort virtually every aspect of firearm freedom. The reason that the Jews want firearms outlawed was the same reason that many medieval principalities outlawed private arms ownership. Then, as now, the people in charge know that laws are just rules written on paper.

To have any effect, a law must be obeyed by most people. And, if the population ever became angry enough with the ruling elite, they could react violently. Indeed, many times throughout history, this has occurred.

So, the Jews, the Liberals and Raceless-Capitalists also know this and, although very slim, the possibility of an armed revolt always exists. When the Jews try to pass more hate-filled laws against our nation, then at the same time, they feel a sense of fear because they might be caught in the act. For example, the Jew US Senator Arlene Specter (R-PA) has recently come up with a new bill to give away US citizenship to non-Whites by the millions.

The Jew Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) is in favor of this horrible bill. This bill itself can only hurt the White race, create more problems in America, and make it easier for the Jews to rule over a heavily divided nation.

The Jews know the ancient adage of "divide and conquer" and use it against our race everyday.

But, these two Jews are not really anti-gun or pro-immigration advocates. For example, both of these Jew Senators are against having non-Jews move to Israel. Both of these Jew Senators are in favor of widespread firearm ownership in Israel for Jews only. In fact, the Jewess Diane Feinstein even drafted an amendment to a firearms law many years ago, that gave permission to armed foreigners to carry fully automatic machine-guns in America when they were spying in America. An outsider might think such a law is crazy, but the fact is, this law passed and allowed Israeli spies, members of the Israeli Mossad, to carry their fully-automatic Uzis while in America. The law stipulated that no more than 50 of these agents would be armed at any given time, but that they would do this on US soil, without even informing the US government. This has been a law since the late 1980s.

So, neither of these Jew Senators, one a Democrat, the other a Republican, is against firearms per se. They both have armed guards that they use to keep them safe. They both want Jews in Israel to be heavily armed, but they don't want angry White men in America to have access to firearms.

Even though this country was founded on self-determination and the private ownership of firearms, these Jews feel threatened by this.

These Jews also feel threatened by an all-White, homogeneous nation, so they come up with laws to flood our nations with more alien people, which guarantee a huge increase in social problems. This isn't something they do against their own Jewish nation, but only against White nations in which they currently have a great deal of power.

When a people love their rulers, then those leaders wish to create the most freedom and make the best society. In Israel, the Jews are one of the most heavily armed populations. Compare this with the unarmed Palestinians, who are kept out of Israel by many huge walls, fences of constantina wire and even landmine fields. These people are alien to the Jews, so the Jews don't want them to have firearms. The Jews naturally view non-Jews as the enemy and they want to disarm their enemy.

And, none of this is any different in America. The Jews in America, who live behind armed, gated communities, love the freedom that the Jews enjoy in Israel, but want to take away those same freedoms that White people have in America. To do this, the Jew does what he does best: he lies. The Jewish media tells us that firearms are dangerous and kill people. But, then why do the police carry firearms and all the politicians have armed security?

In fact, if you were to take a count of all the firearms per person in places like the US Capitol building or the White House, you will find that they are possibly the most heavily armed in the country. One might even think that the US government was a bunch of gun-nuts, with the zeal that they show for firearms.

But, let's look at this more closely. The guns which the US government workers in the US Capitol carry are not the firearms that the gun grabbing Liberals and their Jewish masters are after. No, those guns are good guns.

So, when does a mean, evil piece of manufactured steel go from being a bad gun, into being a good gun? This only happens in one case; when the government controls the gun in question, not when those guns are in the hands of free White men.

Guns, the Jew-controlled-media tries to convince us, are dangerous. They say that guns need to be removed from society to save the children. I can even see Jesse Jackson on CNN telling us that we need to outlaw private firearm ownership for the sake of the "chill-dren."

But, what he is genetically incapable of understanding is a very important political fact. A government is either an institution that is controlled by and for the people of the nation, or it is a tool for a ruling class.

The super-wealthy in America, from all races, and the Jews, view themselves as a distinct political class of people. In Roman society, they wouldn't just be the Patrician, but rather the Senatorial Patricians. But, they really, truly think and act as a separate class of people. And, what's more, they loathe and fear the other classes of people.

This is somewhat akin to the Norman conquest of England. The Normans were a very different ethnic group and viewed their newly conquered subjects with distrust and disdain. The Normans passed laws that were good for the Normans, but were bad for the Anglos and Saxons of England. This is what we have today.

The economic class of people that emerged from the Industrial Revolution that had "big money" became a multi-generational ruling aristocracy. They knew how to make money, but had no wisdom of how to rule over people.

A nation is not a corporate enterprise, it is not a factory, and its citizens are not replaceable workers. A nation is the living existence of our family, our extended family and our heritage. The rules to managing a factory are not the same for the health of a nation.

When the factory management has conflict with the workers, the management can just turn around and replace the worker or workers, or just send the entire factory south to Mexico. This act does hurt the nation, but it might really help the profit margin for the factory owner.

This is just one example of how there is no universal good, but rather the world is composed of and governed by a set of tribal laws; what is good for one is bad for another. The only problem is the White elite have suffered such a disjointed sense of identity, that they are easily used by the Jews to harm people of their own race.

So, when many of these White elites view private firearm ownership, they recoil at the thought. They don't view the private citizens as "their" people, but rather, "those people." The well-to-do Whites do want to have their armed security, their private country clubs, and their bought and paid for police chief who will make sure they are not harmed.

For these people, they feel unsafe to have the rest of society armed, but they are grateful at the sight of a couple of heavily armed Negroes who work at the gate that they pass through to go home. To these people, the arms that the Negroes control at the booth of their gated-community are good firearms. They see them as firearms that might save their life one day, or the life of a loved one.

And, one necessary ingredient for a violent revolution to break out is for circumstances to exist in which the ruling class and the citizens are separated by a set of different laws or de facto different laws. And, this is something America is quickly moving towards.

The Orwellian labeled phrase of "gun-control" is nothing other than the desire to remove firearm freedom from the citizens and to secure the possession of weapons by the ruling class only.

If we look at "unarmed societies" such as the former Soviet Union or at China under the rule of Mao, we see so much violence, death and misery. There were huge caches of firearms in both societies, and many, many armed people, visible on the streets. But, those firearms didn't prevent death and misery. The only firearms that could have done so, would have been privately owned firearms, by a people that had the backbone to use the firearms when need be.

Only with these two elements in our social formula - firearm freedom and a militant citizenry - can a people be free. White people must regain our freedom.

In America, there are an estimated 240 million privately owned firearms, but the citizenry lacks the moral fiber to be considered anything close to being militant. And, to teach our people the truth, to awaken them to the full extent of the damage that has taken place for the White race over the past 100 years, will increase the need and desirability of a social militancy.

So, what the Jews and the rest of the ruling elite do is work at preventing our people from organizing, building our own media, and becoming a powerful political force.

At the same time, they want to take away our firearms because they fear an armed population waking up one day and having vengeance in their hearts. I do look forward to that day.

So, when we, the National Alliance, talk about firearm freedom, we are not really concerned with hunting and the issues which go along with that. Let's look at it in a simply-stated manner. If a government is made up from, by and for the people of the nation, then the people are the government.

If the government has firearms, then the people need to have firearms. To say that the people are free and the government is just a cross-section of the nation, and that the elected officials are "public-servants," then there is no way that the government itself should have a monopoly on the ownership and control of firearms.

The Second Amendment of the US Constitution was never intended to regulate the population or the various states within the nation, but rather as a legal, eternal pact with the citizens that they would be free. And, if any government can take away your firearms, then you are not free and you need to fight to become free.

In America, there has been some good news regarding our firearm freedoms. The first was the end of the 10-year ban against a large variety of many rifles. This was the most pointless, yet intrusive law of its kind. It has been proven so many times that firearm ownership by private citizens is the best defense against crime. Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom are perfect examples of this fact.

In all three of these nations, private firearms ownership was criminalized, yet all three nations have seen a continuing increase in violent crimes.

Here in America, when some very stupid laws were passed, such as the Brady Bill in 1993 and President Clinton's 1994 Assault Weapon ban, I am glad to say the public did not like it. During the 1990s, a growing trend of concealed weapons permits were made easier to obtain in most states in America. This trend of the states issuing "concealed-carry" permits, have resulted in several million Americans, the vast majority of them White, carrying firearms legally.

This put several million more armed people in the heart of where crime is committed, in our communities. But, firearms cannot commit crimes, as they are only inanimate objects. Millions of armed White people know that they have a greater chance of self-defense if they become the victims of crime.

The extremely stupid "1994 Assault Weapons Ban" couldn't have prevented any crime. America doesn't have a crime history of the so-called assault weapons. In fact, for every murder committed with an assault rifle, there are twenty people murdered or beaten to death by weapons other than guns. In fact, there are more people poisoned every year than killed with assault weapons.

When in the history of America has anyone robbed a store with a belt-fed, crew-served machine gun? Never. So, why do Jews and their assorted lackeys want to outlaw belt-fed weapons? Because the Jews know that they are foreigners in our land and they need to have a passive, disarmed population, because it is easier to control. Belt-fed weapons don't cause crimes.

In Utah, you can own a fully automatic, belt-fed 20mm machine gun. They don't commit crimes. But, non-Whites who never existed in Utah 25 years ago commit about 90% of the crime in Utah. We don't need to remove machine guns from our society. We need to remove Mexicans and other non-Whites from our society.

Another pointless law Bill Clinton passed was the Brady Bill. This law created a 5-day waiting period for handgun purchases. In 12 years there has not been one single time that this very expensive federal law ever prevented any crime. All it did was waste a small fortune in tax dollars and create more red tape. But, none of these laws were intended to help society. They were meant to disarm White people.

But, before I move on, I would like to say that in 2004, when the 1994 Assault Weapons ban was scheduled to expire because of a 10-year sunset provision, President Bush openly stated he wanted to extend the ban. But, most members of the US House and Senate know there is nothing helpful about these stupid gun-bans, so there never was any effort to continue this ban. This 10-year ban expired despite the efforts of the moron from Texas.

And, just last month on October 26th, when the Texas moron signed Senate Bill 397 into law, it was again in spite of his efforts, not because of him. President Bush was against this new law, but both the House and Senate passed the bill by a two-thirds majority. If President Bush had vetoed it, the bill would have then gone back to the Senate and they would have overridden the presidential veto. This would have been more than just a slap in the face as it would have showed the world how powerless Bush is becoming in Washington. So, he played along and signed the bill.

This new law now ends the liberal practice of suing firearms manufacturers when Negro and Mestizo criminals kill people with firearms. This completely illogical legal attempt to kill firearms freedom was attempted 33 times and perhaps as much as $500 million dollars were wasted on each side to try these cases.

Again, you have to be a Jew or a Liberal to see a firearm as guilty of committing a crime. You have to be a Jew or a Liberal to see the gun manufacturer as financially liable when a Negro murders someone, instead of the Negro killer being the guilty party.

But, this modern-day social sickness, of blaming firearms for the crimes which non-Whites commit, is not just in America. In Brazil, on the 23rd of October, a national referendum was held to ban firearms in much the same way they have occurred in countries like Australia and Canada, except the nation of Brazil actually gave its people a chance to vote on it. And with over two-thirds of Brazil voting in favor of keeping private firearms freedom, the trend of Canada, Australia and Britain has ended.

Hopefully those three nations will regain their firearms freedom, but in Canada and Britain it isn't likely to be anytime soon. Australia has a better national sentiment on the matter, but their government is just as infected by Jewish corruption as America.

Let me just recap the ideology of the National Alliance. Privately-owned firearms are absolutely necessary for a White nation. The Jew-lead goal of disarming private White citizens of firearms cannot ever help a White society and must be opposed with the strongest measures.

The non-stop media attempt at brainwashing society that firearms are dangerous is illogical and is a huge hot-button issue that we need to capitalize on when spreading our message of racial-political awakening.

The citizens of any nation must militantly, and jealously, defend our freedom, or the Jews will destroy our country. And lastly, non-White crime is a very good reason why our race must stay separate from non-Whites. It is not a reason to give up our freedom to own firearms.

The National Alliance will not water down its message like some kosher-conservative and say, "We are pro-hunter, and so that is why we want to preserve the Second Amendment." The National Alliance is a revolutionary organization to advance the White race in America and around the world. Firearms are the best weapons today. If laser guns existed, then the National Alliance would insist White people need privately-owned laser guns.

To be free, we must be armed. To free our race, we need to organize and spread the ideology of racial separatism. Alone, we can do very little. Working together, we will take back control of our nations. Join with us, the National Alliance.