Thousands of Blacks swarm a beach in South Africa making it a "no go" area for Whites.
Today I would like to talk about the future, at least a possible future. Let's look at the worst case scenario for our race. There are various trends that the media loves to talk about. In politics, they have their tracking polls and, with various budgets, they use economic indicators. With the US demographics we have our annual census, but there are always a variety of other ways to calculate the demographic trends. The current demographic trend is bad for the White race. Everybody knows this.
They talk about the different demographic trends in various European cities. They talk about the demographic trends in a positive manner, though. They always try to say that if a city is diversified, then this is enrichment. At the same time a demographic trend enriches a city, crime goes through the roof, White people move away, and the non-Whites destroy the area. We all know this. But, what is the worst case scenario for these trends?
To look at the demographic trend, there is another trend we have to tie to it -- that is the non-White crime. Crime from non-Whites can vary from something as simple as trespassing across a farmer's ranch when jumping the border, to the furthest reach of crime which turns into basically a military intrusion within a White nation's territory.
The example that we have on July 7th in Great Britain is a perfect example.
There the non-Whites became numerous enough to become militant and, because of recent events, they expressed their feelings in a violent outrage. I can understand the violence in Iraq where the non-Whites want to control their own country and their future, but there is no part of non-White crime that takes place in a White country that is justifiable. Non-Whites should not be there in the first place. The British example -- with the bombings that have occurred -- and the subsequent violence that has taken place -- is not unique.
If we look at Russia, with the situation with the Chechens and the other Middle-Easterners, we see the situation is much the same, only more bloody. If we look at America, with the situation of Mexicans pouring across the border with their political movement of "Azatlan," and their "Mecha" that they have on the college campuses, we see the violence committed against the Whites on even a larger scale. I'm not trying to belittle the victims of the massacres in Britain and in Russia, but America has thousands of White people killed every year by Hispanics. Millions of Whites in America have suffered from violence at the hands of Hispanics in America.
In Germany, they have a huge problem with the Turks which is much the same. In Brussels, Belgium, they have the same problem with Moroccans. It's the same, only the names are slightly different.
These two trends are only able to exist because of two other trends. The one trend that we've talked about a lot on this show is with the media. The existing media can only be summed up as anti-White and subservient to Jews. There is no facet of the existing ideology that is pro-White or anything that is even protective towards Whites or even decent towards Whites. The media trend exists because of the ownership and domination of it is by a foreign group of people: the Jews.
But the political trend is most often done by White people who have adopted the Jewish ideology. As long as White people are brain-washed and have a Jewish world vision, the White people with this mindset will not think outside of the box.
The concept of doing something revolutionary such as simply releasing figures of the decline of the White race and to create a forum which allows the discussion of the destruction of White culture and White society is beyond the thought processes of these people's Jewish ideology. To them, something revolutionary is when Bill Clinton created midnight basketball. They thought, "Wow, the genius behind it all. If we just have more basketball courts open at midnight, then the Negroes won't go out at night and shoot everybody and rape the women because they will be more interested in playing basketball at midnight."
That type of reactionary Jewish mindset is much a part of the media and political trends.
The political trends that exist can only be summated as oppressive against Whites. Any group, any belief and ideology, any goal can bring itself to the forefront of the American political process without being looked down upon except anything pro-White. Homosexual Polynesians are okay. Left-handed, Jewish necrophilliacs -- why not? But, somebody that advocates health for the White race? It is outside of the realm of possibilities; at least with those people with their Jewish mindset.
With these existing trends, the only thing that our future has in front of us is the worst case scenario. Let's look at the economic trends.
The economy of America is still enormous, but the global transfer of industry from the White nations to the non-White nations has severe repercussions in the long run.
When France moved much of its shipbuilding industry to Asia, they lost jobs. But, beyond the shipbuilding workers, they also lost the peripheral industry.
Ask yourself: How do these government people allow this to happen? They have plenty of brilliant, college-educated people with degrees in economics. Why would they do such a thing?
This comes from a different trend. That is the trend of the corporate world trying to remove the concept of nationalities. This is nothing new. The Tri-Lateral Commission openly talked about this in the 1970s, when they thought if they gained control of the wealth of the economies of the world, then the world wouldn't need nation-states anymore. They believed that nationalities would fade away; it would open up the borders, more border crossings, and then the economic elite would become the new royalty of the world. The title of CEO, President, or CFO would be replaced with titles such as Duke or Duchess, Prince or King; that's how these corporate elite view them the world. In their economic model, we are all one nation -- the planet Earth. If the transfer of industry comes France or America, England or Canada, and is shipped over to Malaysia or China, South Korea or Singapore, that's okay. It's just a location change of the same industry which they can invest in. Of course it doesn't work out that way, and the effects harm us all. But, these people have the Jewish ideology, Jewish mindset, so that's what they think is really occurring. And with their lack of ideology, their lack of a sense of duty, their lack of nationalism, all they have to worry about is where they invest their money and what their returns are. This is very selfish and it's very prevalent.
If we look at China and the growth of the Chinese economy, it is staggering. It is the single greatest threat to the White race.
If we look back at 1960, all of the Asian economies combined made up about five percent of the world economy. Today, they make up thirty percent. This is the trend, the direction that everything is headed.
The demographics, political trends, media trends, and the oppressiveness within politics show it all. In Britain, Nick Griffin, the leader of British National Party (BNP), poses a slight threat to the present British government so they bring in trumped up charges against him.
In Germany, there is an election in September. Udo Voight, head of the NPD (Nationaldemocratic Party Deutschland) has been charged with a ridiculous 1998 "racial incitement" charge. This is political oppression. There is no other word for it.
Aside from the economic trends, we should look at cultural degeneracy. When MTV becomes the forefront of White childrens' thoughts by watching a Black rapper talk in a Negro jive manner and they want to do that themselves, if they suddenly accept race-mixing or perhaps prefer race-mixing, if they reject things that are White, if they look down upon White culture, then these people have experienced a facet of cultural genocide, where they themselves are the victims of this.
The worst part of the cultural degeneracy is when it enters the biological realm; the race-mixing.
The race-mixing trends are frightening; they are growing exponentially. In America in the 1950s, when schools began to be integrated, 99% of the Whites were opposed to racial-mixing. In the 2000 census, in Sacramento and Santa Clara counties, one-in-five Whites were in an inter-racial marriage: twenty percent. These trends are ominous. What is it going to be like in 200 years? What is the worst case scenario for our race?
There are two other trends that are slightly juxtaposed to one another, as we have talked about the power of the corporate structures as an on-going trend. With this mindset, the people that run Halliburton, the Bill Gates of the World, the people that run the big oil refineries, the CEO for General Motors, Sanyo, Mitsubishi, the big banking firms, these people regard the United Nations as a central corporate HUB for their new world; their corporate-controlled world.
Within this is the shadow of nationalism that lurks just around the corner. You can see it popping up every now and again. This isn't just with the European model or the South American model, but this is all over the world. Nationalism is a healthy state for people. It can never be done away with. It can be oppressed by those who want to oppress the nationalities; in this case all the nationalities except the Jewish nation.
So, we have two trends. One, we see no more wars on the planet for economic doctrines. Who cares if someone is a communist? Nobody. All of our past wars and all the current conflicts that exist today are linked directly to "Group Identity." Be that religious identity, ethnic identity, or racial identity; all the conflicts are going in that direction. There are no more wars fought for the communists against the capitalists. There are wars that are smaller in ideology such as with the clan-wars. You still have power-struggles within a group of people. In Afghanistan, there are warring tribes and there are warring factions within the same tribe, but there are no more wars on a different economic principle. Those days are gone. It's all along the lines of identity today. This is one reason why nationalism looms near.
But with our worst case scenario, where does this put us in the future?
Watching these demographic trends, these shifts, it almost becomes a game with some people. One person might say, "Oh, I think London is the worst city in Europe, racially speaking."
Someone else might say: "No, have you been to Frankfurt or Amsterdam?"
Everyone watches this. Everyone seems to know this is going on. We despise it, we wish it to go away, but it is going to continue. What is the worst case scenario? We have to look at similar scenarios in history.
When the Ottoman Empire ruled, it took over all the White regions in the Mediterranean and in Europe; the only place today that White people still survive in former Ottoman Empire regions are the areas where Whites united and drove out the Ottomans by violent force. Only in those areas do Whites still exist. In the other areas, they were mongrelized, killed off, or they fled.
If we look at our future in two hundred years, there can only be two places for White people. One, White people would have broken off from the current status quo, formed their own country, be it small city/states, be it rural areas on a mountain-top, wherever; but in those areas where the Whites have broken off and formed self-determinism groups, they alone will be the future for our race. There is no other possible outcome.
The other group of Whites in two hundred years is the Whites that live under the domination of non-Whites. These Whites would be similar to the Whites in the Ottoman Empire. The White women were the sex-slaves sold into the harems. The Blondes and Redheads fetched the most money. The White men were used as officers in the military or as administrators; they were good with math, filing, and they could keep records well. Those Whites don't exist anymore.
This isn't something new. Whites from ancient Egypt are all gone. They are extinct. They went three ways: they were killed by violence, they fled from violence, or they were mongrelized out of existence via miscegenation. That is the only future for the White race if we live under non-White domination.
Let's look at the Zimbabwe model. Twenty five years ago when Rhodesia handed over its country to Zimbabwe, Rhodesia was around four to five percent White. Today, it is less than a half a percent White. The violence there is enormous. The crimes there are enormous. The world outcry doesn't exist. This is acceptable as the victims are White.
This is exactly what happened in every other country in Africa. It is what happened to the Whites in the Belgian Congo and what happened to the Whites in the Kenyan Highlands; it is also what is currently happening in South Africa.
In America, in the areas that the non-Whites have gained enough power, it is happening here. It's also happening in places in Britain; it's happening in places in Germany. There is a region of Berlin that is now half-Turkish. I can go on and on about how many places in Europe are being completely taken over by non-Whites. This is the trend of the future. This is our worst case scenario. How do we stop this?
Let me give you an example of the problem. The problem that our race faces can be summed up in one word: selfishness. Our race knows this problem exists but the people in our race see "Bread and Circuses;" the ability to have fun in the process. They can take a vacation, go to the beach, go to Disneyland, and yet the entire time they're doing this, America is changing about a half a percent a year into being non-White. These Whites know the future for their children is going to be worse, but they don't want to think about it. And when they do think about it, they don't act upon it. Acting upon it doesn't mean they need to get involved with illegal activity; to do some sort of illegal act against the government. No. They can stay completely legal and work for the best interests of their race and help to rally millions of other Whites around the idea; the idea of White self-determinism worldwide.
In the worst case scenario Whites could be completely annihilated. Or, in the worst case scenario Whites might band together in small groups. And even if it was only in small groups of a few thousand here and a few thousand there, that would be enough to ensure our gene-pool continued. Eventually those Whites would have to stabilize their region, form borders, protect and control those borders, and start all over. There is no reason to allow the current trend to continue; in the worst case scenario our race could be annihilated.
All the trends that exist currently only lead to this conclusion. But, like I said earlier, it is the selfishness within our race that is causing us to not come together, to work as a race, to think collectively for the best interest of our race.
One example of this problem comes from a friend of mine. He and his wife make about $150,000 a year. One time I was sitting at his house and he complained to me that he spent over $5,000 on various insurances that year. He has a variety of cars, they have full coverage; flood insurance, and he even has insurance in case his appliances stop working: five thousand dollars.
I invited him to a racial event; a gathering of about 150 people. There were tables set up offering a variety of magazines and books, but he wouldn't buy anything. There was a six dollar book that he liked, but he thought that it was too expensive. I bought several publications, he liked them, he read them, but he would not subscribe to them.
After this racial gathering ended, the people did what happens at about 90% of all racial gatherings, they migrated to the bar afterwards. At the bar, my friend spent upwards of one hundred dollars on Guinness beer. I don't fault a man for wanting to drink Guinness, but I do fault him for his selfishness and his lack of concern for his race.
Six dollars was too much for a book; to buy a subscription to National Vanguard magazine for $22 was too expensive for him. At the same time he admits he spends $5,000 on insurance. And where does his race fall into all of this? It doesn't.
This same man has two children. The idea of them becoming race-mixers is too far removed from his thoughts. He is racially conscious and he knows his children will not become race-mixers. Yet the trends don't say that. The current trends say that we won't exist in 3-400 years.
I have another friend of mine who is an older man. He only had one daughter. In her late twenties, something went wrong and she married a Negro; actually she's married several and has had children with them. He now has Negro grandchildren. He has no contact with them, he has no love for them; he can't. He knows that they represent the death of his gene-pool.
When we have children and we look into their eyes, we can see our future and we can see our ancestors at the same time. That's what children are. They are a living part of our being. They do not just REPRESENT the perpetuation of what we are. Being a racist is not an abstraction. It is a biological determination for what we are. Our uniqueness when mongrelized is destroyed. It is completely removed from existence.
His daughter, the act that she committed, destroyed his gene-pool. This same act is happening to millions of people. If these current trends continue, this will happen to all of us.
In 2-300 years will our remains be dug up by some Chinese anthropologist? Will mummified remains of White people end up in some museum for a Japanese curator to admire? What is the future for our race?
In our worst case scenario we eventually get annihilated completely. And there are politicians and powerful people in the media and the corporate elite that openly advocate for this.
We have one major stumbling block, that is our selfishness. Our race has got to learn to fall in love with itself; so much that we will act only in the best interest of our race. Not in the best interest of immediate gratification, entertainment, or react from fear and not do what is necessary. That is the worst case scenario for our race.
Join with me again next week and we will discuss a best case scenario for our race.
I'm Shaun Walker. Thank you for listening.