The charges against Michael Jackson provide a humorous counterpoint and backdrop for a discussion of the charges against George W. Bush. The charges against Bush are far more serious. Confronted with a choice of two evils like Bush and Kerry, what should a patriot do?
You know what they say Michael Jackson does to little boys. In a sense, George Bush does the same thing to Americans. Think about it. What, exactly, does George Bush do to Americans?
He uses them. Work harder, American slaves. George Bush has spent close to $200 billion on the Iraq war and conservative estimates are that "nation building" there is costing us an additional $4 billion per month. That's money you'll never see again. Disabled American vets need new hospitals? Forget it. We've got to remake the Middle East for Israel.
http://www.costofwar.com
What does George Bush do to Americans? He abuses them. Why should Israel fight her own wars, when George can trick Americans into fighting them for her? Defend America's borders? Hell, no. George has got more important things for our troops to do.
What does George Bush do to Americans? He lies to them. He said we were fighting a war on terror, but America is less safe than at any time in our history. The Afghans and the Iraqis and the Arabs hate us more than ever, our borders are almost unguarded, most of our allies have abandoned us, and George and his neocon handlers are making enemies for America faster than you can say 'weapons of mass destruction.'
What does George Bush do to Americans? He tricks them. Speaking of those pesky WMDs that were supposedly the reason for letting our men get killed, it seems that no one can find them. Even our own intelligence experts now say they probably never existed. Pretty soon George will be telling us that Saddam mailed them to Syria or Iran or whatever country the Zionists want to knock off next. Yeah, that's the ticket!
What does George Bush do to Americans? He makes them bleed. More and more Americans are dying in the sand to make the world safe for Zionism. More died in recent months than at the height of the invasion. Shock and awe, indeed. The entire state of Israel and every luxury condo in it isn't worth a single drop of my son's blood, George.
http://shakti.trincoll.edu/~kiener/Casualties_Chart.htm
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1150
What does George Bush do to Americans? He says he loves them. Michael Jackson loves children, they say, especially boys. George loves Americans, especially dunces. Dunces dumb enough to vote for him again. George sold us out because he knows who runs the TV networks which determine his election chances. They care about Israel, so George cares about Israel. Dead Americans mean little to him, except as a propaganda tool to get us to kill and be killed some more. He couldn't care less about how his military adventures are making the economy tank. And he couldn't care less about Americans thrown out of work by Mexicans coming north or factories going south. He couldn't care less if the America he bequeaths to us when he leaves office is peopled mostly by non-Americans.
There is a difference between George Bush and Michael Jackson, though. We may strongly suspect, but we don't know for sure if Michael Jackson is guilty of molesting little boys -- but at least he'll face charges in court. George and his handlers should face charges, too. Their crimes are far more serious. If you'd like to put America back in the hands of White Americans again, keep listening. There's a lot that we can do.
Some of the saddest things one sees these days are decent, upright, hard-working White folks with Bush-Cheney bumper stickers or yard signs. Bush is not a decent White American working for traditional American values -- not even close. He's a liar who says the things that decent White Americans like to hear while working hand in hand with those who would destroy us, those who would literally kill us.
Some racially-aware Whites claim that we should nevertheless "vote Republican" because the Republicans at least sell us out more slowly than the Democrats, thereby giving us more time to build our defenses. I believe that that is no longer true, if it ever was -- which I doubt. The Federal shackles on our people grew even faster under Reagan than under Carter. The browning of America and the Israelization of America have sped up under George Bush, even when compared to that incredible anti-White degenerate Bill Clinton.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=2970
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4031
Those who are known to be anti-White and multiracialist and anti-freedom -- like Bill Clinton or John Kerry -- have certain strictures on what they can get away with. More people are wise to their agenda, will oppose it, and will be looking for their every transgression as a way of bringing them down. Kerry, with his Jewish ancestry, would ironically have to tread the softest in certain areas like Zionism for fear that he would bring the Jewish agenda and the question of Jewish power out in the open with any dramatic or unpopular moves. But with a Ronald Reagan or a George Bush, the people will be lulled to sleep.
What the decent -- but woefully ignorant -- mass man "knows" about politicians is often the diametric opposite of the truth.
He "knows" that Ronald Reagan was fighting those "liberals" who were tearing down the Old America and trashing all the values he holds dear. But when Reagan himself signs the "Martin Luther King" holiday bill, it must be all right. He's a good fellow, one of us, and he knows best. When Reagan sends American troops to support the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, the Israeli side must therefore be the side of the angels.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3096
http://nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3666
The mass-man "knows" that George Bush is a "good man" who would never betray America. Why, wasn't he the man who turned back the evil forces of Gore and the Clintons? We won! Bush is our man, our leader! He has a plan to make America great again. Just like Reagan had a plan to roll back the size of government, but instead increased it more than any administration in history up to that time. And like Nixon had a "secret plan" to bring "peace with honor" in Vietnam -- supervised by Henry Kissinger, of course. And we all know how successful that was -- but never mind, memories are short, very short.
People would also find it hard to believe that a Conservative British Prime Minister would be the one to effectively sign the death warrant of the British Empire, but that's exactly what happened. And the fact that the people were lulled to sleep by patriotic slogans and images and fatherly figures (with a hidden Jewish knife to the back) was one of the main factors in the tragedy.
Better an open enemy than a pretended friend. Better an open traitor than a crypto-traitor. Better an open tyrant than a pretended patriot. Better that they rename the White House Zion House instead of pretending that America is still ours and White people still have a voice in the government; better that they rename the US Army the Janissaries for the Jews instead of pretending that it still is what it used to be; and better that they tear down the Jefferson Memorial and replace it with a statue of Nat Turner and Baruch Goldstein standing amid a field of slain White children and holding aloft a bloody sickle than that we continue the pretense that America is still for Americans. If that was done, the free thinkers among our people would have focus. Then they would understand that there has been a revolution and they lost. Then they would have an enemy they can see instead of one who hides behind the curtain of the CRT screen of the machinery of illusion and who exercises his power without responsibility for his acts.
Seen in this light, a Kerry (ancestral name Kohn) presidency -- while in no announced policy or stated value better than a Bush presidency -- would be better for the awakening of White people than a Bush presidency.
Patriots have been united in their disgust for the miserable Bush, but divided on our proper attitude toward the election. The estimable publisher of the long-running patriotic newspaper The Truth at Last, Dr. Edward Fields, has endorsed Ralph Nader because of the independent candidate's anti-Zionism and despite his multiracialism and Semitic ancestry. And it's hard not to be persuaded by Dr. Fields' argument. Anyone roundly and enthusiastically hated by the ADL and a substantial portion of the Jewish establishment must have something good about him. And something good is better than the practically nothing good you get with Kohn or Bush. The logic is that an impressive vote total for Nader will send an anti-Zionist, anti-neocon, and anti-two-party-system message to Washington and prime the White public with an awareness that we can break out of the two-party prison that binds us.
http://www.thetruthatlast.com
In contrast, pro-White activist and writer David Duke has called for "anybody but Bush." In a moving indictment of the neocon's own pet president, and marshalling devastating evidence that Bush's disastrous Iraq war was an anti-American power play from the beginning and Bush knew it, Duke calls on voters to punish Bush while acknowledging that Kerry is no better, possibly worse. Duke says that no matter how bad Kerry is, we must send an unmistakable message that traitors to America like Bush will be punished by being put out of office. Thus Duke's position is mutually exclusive to Fields', since we cannot simultaneously work for an impressive Nader vote and try and help Kerry trounce Bush.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3985
Pro-White writer and top-flight attorney Edgar Steele also thinks support for a third party is a wise though imperfect choice. He says "This time, vote like your life depends upon it. It does, you know, more than at any other time. Vote against both Bush and Kerry. There are other candidates. A lot of people like Ralph Nader, and with good reason. Myself? I'm voting for the Constitution Party's Michael Peroutka. Why? Because the Constitution Party best mirrors my political outlook."
[ ]http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/slave.htm
Fields and Duke and Steele all have valid points. But the Chairman of the National Alliance, Erich Gliebe, expressed the most cogent view, and the one closest to my own, in a recent editorial:
An American presidential election year is a trying time for some of our members, most notably some of our newer members. As an organization, we are very much attuned to the political situation, and some of us are tempted to jump on a bandwagon when the banners start waving.
For example, when someone - anyone - slams President Bush and his lies, even the most seasoned racialist can feel the urge to become distracted from our tasks involving the Alliance.
...But the important consideration to bear in mind is that we in the Alliance are not overly concerned about who wins this election or any other. In the coming months, it will be increasingly difficult to ignore what the presidential candidates are saying. We'll be swamped with television advertisements, bumper stickers and yard signs bedecked with campaign slogans, and clips from the candidates' speeches on the evening news - not to mention 24-hour coverage from the cable networks. We'll roll our eyes as Bush talks about "shared values," "Iraqi freedom," and the "coalition of the willing." Everything George Bush says will ring hollow in our ears because we've been watching him for over three years and we have a definite opinion about what kind of man he is.
On the other hand, most things John Kerry says will tend to sound good. When he criticizes Bush's environmental record and talks about an economy that "takes care of our own," we'll tend to be receptive because such ideas are compatible in a general way with the racial philosophy of the Alliance. In fact, it would come as a surprise to many mainstreamers who think they know about the National Alliance that there are several beliefs that we share with Democrats, although we disagree with them as to the rationale behind those beliefs and on the details of how to implement those beliefs in society.
The point here is that we must not be diverted away from our Alliance activities for even one minute to work for Bush's defeat. The problem with the words of Kerry and Edwards is that they are simply that: words - words that sound good but have absolutely no substance behind them. For example, in order to "take care of our own," all immigration into this country, both legal and illegal, would have to be completely shut down. Tariffs would have to be raised and many imported products categorically barred from entering the country. Legislation would have to be passed forbidding industries from shipping American jobs overseas. Clearly, no matter what they say, Kerry and Edwards don't really plan to take care of American workers.
As another example, the other day I happened to catch a part of one of Kerry's speeches on CNN. He mentioned something about his plan to restore America's image in the eyes of the international community, apparently referring to Bush's diplomatic failures and his dogged determination to destroy Iraq despite the objections of much of the world. Well, as we in the Alliance know, the only way to gain the favor of the Arab world - and all of Europe, for that matter - is to cease all aid and sever all ties to Israel. And that item hasn't been on any promising presidential candidate's agenda for a long, long time.
And finally, remember that the Democratic Party wants to embrace more and more of everyone we want to live apart from, such as non-Whites and homosexuals. No, for all the glib words of Kerry and Edwards that we'll be subjected to every day until November, having those men in the White House as opposed to Bush doesn't change our plans one iota.
...Remember that we're building an organization that has a vision that towers far above the shallow platforms of the vote-seeking Republicans and Democrats and Libertarians. We need far-sighted and focused people to realize that vision, people who don't get distracted by the moment-to-moment concerns that fascinate most people. I hope you'll make the choice to take part in our effort.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3583
Here's the way I'd put it.
As long as the Jewish-controlled media have a stranglehold on the minds and hearts of the people of the West, the political choices we are offered will always be puppets of the Jewish supremacists. There is no way out of the execution chamber that they have planned for our people as long as we do not have our own thriving and truly competitive White media, and a whole White society within a society to support them. As nutty as they are, the evangelical Christian Zionists are way ahead of us in that department. They have their own schools and even colleges, their own bookstores and thriving publishing chains, their own summer camps, their own radio networks -- not just programs, mind you, but networks, and even the politicians that hate them are afraid to cross them. Their ideology may be Judeo-centric in many areas, which accounts for the lack of persecution they get compared to that received by pro-White folks, but that's irrelevant to what I'm saying. No matter what the obstacles, we need to get to the point where they are -- and then surpass it by 100 times.
Our ideas are right and our heritage is uniquely inspiring, and, if presented properly, can elevate the hearts and souls of our people and motivate them to great deeds not 100 but 10,000 times more than tawdry tales of ancient Jews in the desert or the threat of imaginary "weapons of mass destruction." The idea of a White future can catch fire among our people in a few years -- if we do our job right. We need to support those who are working for a new White state and new White media, or join them and help them with every fiber of our being to do a better job. We need to put everything we've got into that effort. We have no time to waste.
We're locked out of election 2004. Sure, you can follow the advice of the fine men I quoted earlier and send the traitors a message while in the voting booth. But don't even bother going by the voting booth unless it's on time you would have spent relaxing and unwinding anyway, unwinding from the truly important work you have to do. Don't bother going to the polls if by doing so you would take even one millisecond away from working for the National Alliance and the necessary and beautiful White future that is the fixed star that guides us.
In a cold cell in Toronto, Canada, a 64 year-old painter and pacifist sits on a fat stack of trial transcripts and marks a year and a half of solitary confinement. He sits on the transcripts because his jailers will not permit him to have a chair. He has no criminal record and has not been charged with a crime, and yet he wears the same orange jumpsuit as the murderers and rapists housed elsewhere in the prison. He is not permitted to confront or cross-examine his accusers in court. The "evidence" against him includes hearsay, double-hearsay, and triple-hearsay.
The object of the exercise is to deport this man to Germany, where he faces a five-year prison sentence for the crime of "defaming the dead." This man hasn't lived in Germany since he was 19 years old, and hasn't set foot in Germany for years. He emigrated to Canada in 1958, and in the year 2000 he moved to the United States to live quietly with his American wife in the rolling hills of Tennessee.
There, he painted landscapes and still lifes in his studio-until he was hauled off one bright morning and whisked to Canada by American law enforcement officials. His name is Ernst Zundel, and he is the world's premier thought-criminal. Find out who this man really is. You will be astonished to learn why this man is so feared by the world's manipulators of your thoughts. Read the new book by the man who is so feared by the would-be censors and rulers of the West: Setting the Record Straight: Letters From Cell Number 7 by Ernst Zundel.
This book is a collection of moving, incisive, and illuminating letters from the man who has felt the Iron Heel of Jewish power directly on his neck for decades -- and who has suffered at their hands as much as anyone this side of the Dead Sea. Ernst Zundel, a pacifist and artist who never sought to harm anyone, who sought only to stand up for the honor of his ancestors, found himself the object of vicious legal persecution in Canada beginning in the 1980s. Even his detractors admit he has done nothing but write and speak -- but writing and speaking outside the bounds permitted by B'nai B'rith resulted in a decade-long series of trials that ultimately ended in victory for Zundel in the Supreme Court of Canada and a great deal of embarrassment for the Jewish supremacists, as many of their most cherished wartime atrocity stories were demolished under cross-examination and investigation by the Zundel legal and forensics team. Zundel made history -- real history -- so when he wanted to retire to the rolling hills of Tennessee, the Jewish establishment would not let him live in piece. Vindictive almost beyond belief, they colluded with corrupt government officials to engineer his abduction and imprisonment without charge. Learn the whole shocking story from the man who lived it by reading Setting the Record Straight: Letters From Cell Number 7. This 180 page book is our Item 1140n from National Vanguard Books, and is available for $8.95 plus $3 postage and handling, a total of $11.95. Write to:
National Vanguard Books
Box 330
Hillsboro WV 24946
USA
Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you that freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.
